Skip to main content
October 19, 2009 – Raise your hand if you’ve ever heard of Transition Towns. I hadn’t until very recently. I’d like to share the little bit I know, because I think this is an idea whose time has come.

The idea is that people with an awareness of the changes underway in our world should begin discussions on the local level about surviving global climate change. Because members of communities bring varying talents and knowledge to the table, each can make a contribution to the common good.

To my mind, a big piece of the puzzle will consist simply of people sharing their tools and appliances with one another, rather than each household needing to own one. Carpooling trips to the grocery and pharmacy would be a good place to start. Banning leaf blowers would be a simple way to reduce a neighborhood’s carbon footprint, as would the use of non-motorized lawn mowers. Growing food organically where grass used to grow would be an improved use of lawn space. Eliminating association bans on clothes lines would make a terrific amount of sense.

That’s the way it works. Ideas are, of course, the easy part, but as long as there are community members willing to take the lead and set the example, all these ideas and more will become part of The New Paradigm. This will take time, and because time is something we may not have a great deal of, it’s never been more truly said that the sooner we get started, the sooner we’ll get where we’re going. Once numbers of towns get their transition underway, they will have lots to share in the way of tips and pointers with those not quite so far along with the process.

Is anyone consulting with the Amish about this? It seems to me they would have so much to tell us. What I want to know is, How did they know it was time to stop? How did they know the industrial revolution had become a bankrupt proposition? Someone endowed with remarkable prescience acted upon his or her beliefs, and got others to join in. Or are they a group of people motivated solely by their religious beliefs? Certainly they have no use for science, I know that. They may very well harbor serious doubts about the validity of global warming science!

The fellow who got the transition project underway, Rob Hopkins, is British and an academic. His website can be found at http://www.transitionculture.org/. Here in the United States, the transition movement is in its infancy. You can learn more about it at
http://www.transitionus.org/.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Greenland: A State of Rapid Collapse

 September 1, 2020 The good news, such as it is, goes like this: the suspense is over. No need to guess about whether sea level rise will be life-altering by the end of this century or not. It will, at least for the 40 percent of humankind which lives on or near a coastline. That's because all the ice on Greenland is going to melt, according to researchers at Ohio State University (yes, yes, I know - it's THE Ohio State University. Get over yourselves.) Their research appeared in the journal Nature Communications Earth and Environment in August. Total meltdown will take 10,000 years, but enough will have melted by 2100 to cause sea level rise of approximately three feet. That will cover a lot of coastal property, a loss made worse by storms and hurricanes. How have researchers reached this conclusion? By studying almost 40 years of satellite data. Glaciers on Greenland have shrunk so much since the year 2000 that even if global warming came to a complete stop, they would contin...

The Environmental Polluting Agency

April 17, 2020 Under cover of an historic pandemic, the EPA has announced it will suspend enforcement of environmental laws. You read that right. The agency is hoping we're all so distracted that no one will notice. Why would they do this, you ask. It will come as no surprise that a number of industries, including oil, have asked for the suspension. In the words of EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler: EPA "recognizes challenges resulting from efforts to protect workers and the public from COVID 19 may directly impact the ability of regulated facilities to meet all federal regulatory requirements." Critics of the hiatus concede exceptions to regulations could be made on a case-by-case basis, for example, if companies are short-staffed because employees are working from home. But those industries deemed essential and continuing to operate should be expected to comply with the law. In fact, because COVID 19 is exacerbated by air pollution, leading to higher death rates, pol...