Skip to main content

New World Environmental Leader?

March 5, 2017 - China's coal consumption dropped for the third year in a row in 2016.  This, coupled with the country's shift away from heavy industry, could well portend cleaner air and water. As you know, cleaner air in China means cleaner air everywhere. With a population of 1.35 billion people, China currently produces twice as much carbon dioxide in the form of emissions as the United States.

Given that the US has a population less than 1/4 the size of China's, their emissions would quadruple our own, if their standard of living matched ours. Thank goodness it doesn't. Be aware, however, that the government of China is transitioning to an economy based on consumer spending. That could spell trouble.

In the meantime, China's National Bureau of Statistics indicates that China's coal consumption fell by 4.7 percent in 2016. Coal's share of total energy consumed fell to 62% in 2016, from 64% in 2015. In the United States, by contrast, the government pledges to restart the American coal industry. As of February this year, coal companies may once again dump mining waste into streams and waterways. The Trump administration claims 77,000 jobs will be saved because of this change, a number widely viewed with skepticism.

As crazy as it sounds, Trump has called climate change a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese. Scott Pruitt, the new director of the Environmental Protection Agency, plans to free fossil fuel companies from the need to report methane emissions. Methane has a global warming potential more than 2500% greater than that of carbon dioxide.

While China has begun a $474 billion renewable energy program, with huge wind and solar farms under construction, close to one fifth of current capacity goes to waste, due to the inability to connect energy farms to the grid. "I think people here can't wait … long before solving the air pollution problem, so I think the domestic pressure itself is already large enough for China to take action," a Chinese climate change specialist was quoted as saying.

China has long ordered the closing of small, inefficient coal mines. It far exceeded its goal of eliminating 250 million tons in excess capacity last year. Construction plans for 103 coal-fired power plants were cancelled in January of this year. Resulting unemployment will need to be addressed. As we have learned here at home, retraining will provide part of the solution to that problem.

With my thanks to The Christian Science Monitor, and China correspondent Bill Birtles

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Greenland: A State of Rapid Collapse

 September 1, 2020 The good news, such as it is, goes like this: the suspense is over. No need to guess about whether sea level rise will be life-altering by the end of this century or not. It will, at least for the 40 percent of humankind which lives on or near a coastline. That's because all the ice on Greenland is going to melt, according to researchers at Ohio State University (yes, yes, I know - it's THE Ohio State University. Get over yourselves.) Their research appeared in the journal Nature Communications Earth and Environment in August. Total meltdown will take 10,000 years, but enough will have melted by 2100 to cause sea level rise of approximately three feet. That will cover a lot of coastal property, a loss made worse by storms and hurricanes. How have researchers reached this conclusion? By studying almost 40 years of satellite data. Glaciers on Greenland have shrunk so much since the year 2000 that even if global warming came to a complete stop, they would contin...

The Environmental Polluting Agency

April 17, 2020 Under cover of an historic pandemic, the EPA has announced it will suspend enforcement of environmental laws. You read that right. The agency is hoping we're all so distracted that no one will notice. Why would they do this, you ask. It will come as no surprise that a number of industries, including oil, have asked for the suspension. In the words of EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler: EPA "recognizes challenges resulting from efforts to protect workers and the public from COVID 19 may directly impact the ability of regulated facilities to meet all federal regulatory requirements." Critics of the hiatus concede exceptions to regulations could be made on a case-by-case basis, for example, if companies are short-staffed because employees are working from home. But those industries deemed essential and continuing to operate should be expected to comply with the law. In fact, because COVID 19 is exacerbated by air pollution, leading to higher death rates, pol...