Skip to main content

August 9, 2009 – Well, well. It appears the Pentagon is taking a look at the havoc climate change will be causing, and trying to figure out what the military and humanitarian implications might be. I hope that once they’ve examined the issue closely, they will begin doing some cooperative planning with the folks at the UN. While there are those decrying the uselessness of NATO, I have to think that organization might have a key role to play in addressing the looming crisis. There’s a great deal to anticipate and plan for, and I definitely believe this is an instance where two heads are better than one. Well-informed heads, that is. The earlier we learn to cooperate with each other, the better off we will all be.

Assuming humankind is capable of cooperation on a sustained basis, how would we best go about it? There are organizations that have made it their business to learn all they can about global warming. The Worldwatch Institute comes to mind.

The Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, Wildlife Federation, Greenpeace, and the American Farmland Trust are just a few of the others. Surely it would make sense to invite them to educate the rest of us. Our federal government should take the lead in seeing to it that this happens. A public/private cooperative venture would be necessary, something terribly worthwhile for which our tax dollars could be used.

Generally, once people are convinced there’s a problem, they look for ways to be part of the solution. Certainly one way would be to ask them to promote international cooperation, by means of letter writing, phone calling, and signing up for cooperative activities they find described on the web. All of this would be reinforced with public service announcements on TV, the web, Facebook, Twitter, etc. Not everyone would be interested in promoting the same ideas. That’s ok – it’s a big problem that will require any number of solutions. At the same time, we would need to remember that climate change is a global problem which will mandate the active leadership of our country. The United States has done far too much to cause the problem to opt out when push comes to shove. As wealthy as we are, we must help in finding and implementing durable, sustainable solutions.

In order to gain the trust of the international community, Americans would need to be good listeners like never before. Our problems will not be identical to China’s problems. Or Israel’s problem’s. Or Brazil’s problems. They will have definite opinions with regard to the best way to ameliorate their own environmental problems. Again, the best way of making a positive contribution might well be through education. Discussion, education, discussion, action. This could be a model for international cooperation with the purpose of healing the environment.

Next week I’ll talk about the dire need for optimistic, persistent leadership as a model for international survival.


Popular posts from this blog

We Are Still In

June 13, 2017 - Trump's announcement that the United States would withdraw from the Paris Accord on Climate Change has produced a remarkable backlash: hundreds of cities, states, universities and colleges, and businesses in the United States have declared their collective intention to reach the country's 2025 emissions goals, with or without federal leadership. America stepped up to the plate when Trump stated that he was "elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris," to which Pittsburgh's mayor responded "we [Pittsburgh] will follow the guidelines of the Paris Agreement for our people, our economy and future."

Bill Peduto, mayor of Pittsburgh, is a member of Mayors for 100% Clean Energy, the creation of Sierra Club, to which Michael Bloomberg is a major contributor. Bloomberg, former mayor of New York City and a billionaire philanthropist, is also the United Nations Envoy for Cities and Climate Change.
In a letter written by Bloomberg to…

The SunShot Initiative

In 2007, the amount of solar power installed in the U.S. was 1.1 gigawatts (GW). As of 2017, that amount has increased to 47.1 GW. Enough to power 9.1 million average American homes. If you're thinking "we've still got a long way to go," you'd be right. On the other hand, increasing installed power by 4300% deserves some attention.  How'd we do it?

The Department of Energy played an important role. In 2011, they initiated a program called The SunShot Initiative. They set targets for the years 2020 and 2030, by which times generating solar power would have become more affordable. More affordable on a utility scale, more affordable on a commercial scale, and more affordable on a residential scale. Thus far, they've succeeded in hitting the 2020 goal for utility-scale generation. Needless to mention, they reached that goal three years early. The goals, it should be mentioned, don't take subsidies into account. It's the technology, in the case of util…