Skip to main content

October 13, 2009 – October has been a mixed bag, thus far, though a few more of those bright, blue-sky days that serve as a backdrop to the colors of the changing leaves wouldn’t hurt at all. The weekend was sunny and brisk, perfect for working outside. I observed some interesting things while gardening that I thought I would share.

First, and not at all amazingly, the chickadees are steady, noisy customers at the sunflower buffet. I think they’re helping themselves to Echinacea seeds, too. A bit more surprising, perhaps, is the plenteousness of bird activity I’m seeing. All the birds seem to have a lot to say these days; it’s a very songful bunch I have in the backyard. The continuing abundance of rain coupled with warm nighttime temperatures is causing some flowers to re-bloom. Hydrangea, gazania and hibiscus are the three stand-outs in my yard. My floribunda rose, Distant Drums, continues to wend its gorgeous way through the year.

My most startling observation was – a grasshopper! I haven’t seen one in

years, and had assumed we’d managed to kill them off with conventional

farming practices. Are these pesticide-resistant grasshoppers? Time will tell. Finally, I found ladybugs on a few of my plants. It’s certainly late to be seeing the first of the season, but that’s what these were. The conclusion I draw from these few, scattered observations is that 2009 is still off-schedule, as it has been right from the start.

Glacier melt continues to be THE global warming story of 2009. All glaciers are melting faster than predicted just a few years ago. Accelerated glacier melt in the Himalayas could well spell disaster for those Chinese people dependent upon the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers, which rely upon those glaciers for their water supply. Permanent glacier melt in the Andes mountains in South America promises to leave those living in the adjacent valleys without a source of water. Indeed, Lima, Peru, a city located in the Andes, faces a similar future. Water originating in the Sierra Nevada mountains of California is all spoken for, and then some – so much so that hard choices between adequate water supply for city dwellers and sufficient water for the irrigation needs of farmers are having to be made. So far, the city dwellers are winning. (The above information was drawn from Lester Brown’s book Plan B 4.0, pp. 66-68.)

These examples are the merest tip of the – glacier? Hard choices, heartbreaking choices will, in some cases, necessitate decisions whose ramifications are unacceptable to millions of people. Decisions which are made in the interests of the greatest good for the largest number of people could well spawn political and governmental chaos. The nearest and best road to well-thought-out alternatives to the status quo is to begin the decision making now. Governments will need to begin the discussion

at the local level, with the direct participation of those citizens most likely to be directly affected. The careful reasoning employed to discover the most beneficial outcomes must not only be expressed in easy-to-understand language, it must be written down, so that future generations will know not only what, but why.

Let’s get started!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Truly, There's Nothing to be Afraid of

February 26, 2013 – The 1960s scared conservatives worse than I knew – worse than a lot of us knew, I guess.   Certainly I lived through that period.   Certainly young adults found their voices, and had the nerve to object to being put through the meat grinder called Vietnam.   Black Americans continued to seek justice and equality in their adopted homeland.   Change was inevitable.   It’s understandable that conservatives wanted a say in what those changes would be.   Their fearful reaction was – and is - badly overblown.   Others’ happiness is nothing to fear.     These longed-for changes cost conservatives nothing but their unearned, self-satisfied atrophy.   Young people went on dying, even so. It turns out all of that change scared the socks off market fundamentalists.   Determined to return the country to its previous perceived state of inertia, Lewis Powell wrote a memorandum for the US Chamber of Commerce, urging a sh...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...