Skip to main content
April 12 – Lots of people are wondering about the number of severe earthquakes experienced recently. Our perception that there has been an increase in the number of earthquakes of significant magnitude is difficult to verify. The little bit of hard data available, courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey, does not indicate an increase, though it does depend upon what magnitude you’re researching, and which years. Are the media giving earthquakes more coverage than they used to? That possibility certainly cannot be discounted.

I’ve heard an interesting theory that’s been offered to explain an increase, and I thought
I’d share it with you. It is highly theoretical, and, as I say, the numbers pro or con are
difficult to verify. Figures lie, and liars figure. Slicing and dicing numbers can lead in many different directions. This theory is, in my opinion, worth pondering, so – for whatever it’s worth – here it is: we know that an enormous amount of Arctic ice has
melted. The water that was once contained in this ice has now been dispersed across the oceans. The weight contained in the ice has been similarly dispersed. Is it possible that the increase in the ocean’s water weight is sufficient to cause the movement of tectonic plates? Be mindful: the ocean’s total weight has not increased; some of it has moved. Where it was once confined to one general area, in the form of ice, it is now widely dispersed, in the form of water. Different locations now have more weight bearing down on them than they did before. Whether there is enough additional weight in seismically active locations to cause an increase in seismic activity is the $64,000 question. Coming up with precise, accurate numbers in order to prove or disprove such a theory would probably be impossible, so we will likely never know if this is what’s happening. Could this theory be the explanation? You be the judge.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

This morning I read that two more glaciers in Glacier National Park have melted, and that the rest are expected to disappear, along with the streams they feed, no later than 2020.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

I am now the proud owner of a reel lawn mower, i.e., a non-motorized lawn mower. It’s not as hard to push as I thought it might be, and nowhere near as noisy as another model I tried. The cutting height can vary between one and three inches, though I gather a setting as low as one inch requires careful adjusting. Right now my primary motivation is beheading our bodaciously healthy-looking crop of dandelions. That battle will last the better part of April. It’s a war I’ll never win, but as long as the yellow-headed monsters aren’t upsetting the neighbors too much, I’m ahead of the game.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

My gardening technique continues to move in the direction of permaculture. I’ve planted the snowpeas directly beneath a Rose of Sharon bush, so they can use it as a trellis. On an actual trellis I plan to grow “Jewel of Africa” vining nasturtiums (flowers and leaves are edible – mild black pepper flavor). Brand-new raspberry bushes (more accurately termed raspberry sticks, at this point) occupy one corner of the vegetable garden, and strawberries will occupy a berm, with evergreens for company. Two apple trees now occupy opposite sides of the front yard. Though I know permaculture is defined as requiring minimal labor, I just have to dig, so I’ve been busy burying last autumn’s leaves in the vegetable garden. I’ve worked on amending its soil for years and am finally beginning to see some payoff. Two kinds of lettuce, carrots, snowpeas, and potatoes are all making good progress. I just planted broccoli. Next comes digging in the green manure on the other side of the garden, where I’ll plant my warm weather veggies.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Great March for Climate Action

December 23, 2013 – Have you heard about The Great March for Climate Action?   I just learned about it today.   Organizers have determined it will take them 246 days to march from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C.   They are looking for 1,000 people – 20 from each state – to participate.   The march is stopping in many, many locations along the way so that locals can participate for as little as a day, or as long as they like. The march is Ed Fallon’s brainchild.   Ed, along with most of his staff members, is from Iowa, where he served as a state legislator for fourteen years.   He currently hosts a radio program called Fallon Forum.   Fallon began his career as a social activist coordinating the Iowa section of the Great Peace March in 1986.  Ed bases his approach on Great Marches of the past.  Women suffragists marched on Washington on March 3, 1913; Gandhi led the Salt March in India on March 12, 1930; Dr. King led the voting rights march from Selma to Montgomery

Greenland: A State of Rapid Collapse

 September 1, 2020 The good news, such as it is, goes like this: the suspense is over. No need to guess about whether sea level rise will be life-altering by the end of this century or not. It will, at least for the 40 percent of humankind which lives on or near a coastline. That's because all the ice on Greenland is going to melt, according to researchers at Ohio State University (yes, yes, I know - it's THE Ohio State University. Get over yourselves.) Their research appeared in the journal Nature Communications Earth and Environment in August. Total meltdown will take 10,000 years, but enough will have melted by 2100 to cause sea level rise of approximately three feet. That will cover a lot of coastal property, a loss made worse by storms and hurricanes. How have researchers reached this conclusion? By studying almost 40 years of satellite data. Glaciers on Greenland have shrunk so much since the year 2000 that even if global warming came to a complete stop, they would contin