Skip to main content

Do the Right Thing

December 13, 2010 – There are a couple of stories in the news worth talking about. The first, about the climate talks in Cancun, is a bit of a surprise: the talks have resulted in the adoption of two agreements. One is an agreement to further delay deciding the fate of the Kyoto Protocol (that’s not the surprise). The second, to which both China and the United States are parties, involves committing to cut greenhouse gas emissions, establishes a framework for transparency, sets up a global climate fund of $100 billion, and recognizes the importance of limiting deforestation.

Some brief discussion, if you please. It goes without saying, God help us if the R’s take back the White House in ’12. The 192 other countries (all attendees, with the exception of Bolivia) who adopted the agreement can and will proceed without us, if need be, but that would be a thoroughly bankrupt outcome for a small victory that was extremely difficult to achieve. The United States should absolutely aspire to show leadership in forging a new treaty, with specific goals as part of the agreement. The next meeting of the UN Climate Conference, to take place in Durban, South Africa next year, needs to fashion an historic treaty. People speak of “being able to live with” the Cancun agreement. Without a Durban Treaty, there will be no living with anything.

The sum allocated for aid to developing countries - $100 billion – is paltry. No amount is large enough, of course, but $100 B is embarrassing. Yes, times are hard, and yes, we can always offer to give more later. I hope that will happen in Durban.

A word about Bolivia. Landlocked Bolivia is dependent upon spring glacier-melt for its water. As its glaciers continue decreasing in size, Bolivia becomes more and more frantic. So would I, if I were them. South American countries need to take it upon themselves to assure Bolivia of access to potable water. That, or they need to assure thirst-crazed Bolivians of a new home within their borders. Failing to do either of these things can only lead to military conflict. Far better to act while there is still time.

Thanks to the US Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., the EPA’s first carbon pollution standards will be in force come January. Major league polluters and the state of Texas (same thing!) were suing to up-end new regulations. Their complaints were found to be without merit, so the regulations stand. THAT is what progress looks like, friends!

A word about Texas. (Full disclosure: I lived there for five years a long while back.) Children have been raising children have been raising children have been raising children in that state for a long time, now. Would you be surprised to learn that 15-year-olds don’t know what they think about anything, and for that reason have nothing of value to pass along to their kids? The result is a state full of moral know-nothings who do whatever is expedient. This is the state that gave us Tom DeLay. This is the state that gave us Enron. This is the state that gave us our 43rd President – you know, the guy who told all of us to shop, in answer to the WTC attacks!!

Anyway, they don’t know anything about doing the right thing. That’s why they lost their lawsuit!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...