Skip to main content

Someone's Knockin' at the Door

In an article I wrote for Transition Voice, I wrote about the possible effect of peak everything on climate change. That, I believe, is only half the cycle. As you may recall, I stated that the overall effect of peak non-renewables production might be positive, i.e., the increasing cost of recovering fossil fuels could well serve to make them scarcer, thereby mitigating the effects of climate change. Let me repeat: this could be an outcome of peak everything. There will likely be other, less welcome, changes as well.
In this article, I’d like to examine the other half of the cycle: the impact of climate change on peak non-renewables production. The world was only recently on the receiving end of a startling warning in this regard. The torrential rains which have destroyed lives and property in the province of Queensland, Australia, have also managed to temporarily close the region’s coal mines (http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/01/20/3117184.htm), with an economic impact likely to be felt for the remainder of the year. Thus far, other coal-producing nations have been eager to fill the void. What happens when they, too, suffer the “slings and arrows (http://www.enotes.com/shakespeare-quotes/not-that-question)” of outrageous weather (http://www.earth-policy.org/images/uploads/book_files/wotebook.pdf)? As climate disruption’s fury gathers; as methane adds its short-lived but mightily potent poison to the already toxic stew that now comprises our atmosphere; as 390 ppm becomes 400, and then 410 … how on earth will any kind of business manage to conduct “business as usual (http://www.postcarbon.org/reader)?”
How do offshore drilling rigs go on drilling in the face of ever-more-damaging hurricanes? How is oil transported over the high seas in the midst of constantly-increasing numbers of typhoons? If the coal mines of Queensland can be flooded, be assured the same thing can, and will, happen elsewhere. Indeed, the mining of non-renewable ores, along with rare metals, stands to be slowed or halted all over the world, depending upon the “flavor” of climate disruption experienced in the affected region: record-setting rains and/or snowfall, tornadoes occurring in both usual and unusual places, increasing lightning strikes and their potential effect upon provision of electricity ((http://www.earth-policy.org/images/uploads/book_files/wotebook.pdf), drought and the consequent dearth of food for workers - I suspect you by now understand that this could grow into a very long list. All of these phenomena have already been observed.
It is indeed difficult to wring a happy ending from this version of our future. As surely as climate disruption will interrupt the flow of manmade pollutants, it will also just as surely interrupt everything else. Its impacts will not be experienced equally in all places on the globe; there may even be areas that will consider themselves lucky. Even as the devastation wrought upon our precious planet by human greed and ignorance slowly grinds to a halt, though, the ongoing effects could well make human life unendurable in many other, less fortunate, regions. To depend upon luck to pull us through the expected collapse of environmental and economic systems can only lead to heartbreak.
Time is short, the need for mitigative action immediate. Change the way you live today. Tell your government to do likewise.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wildfires

March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.

Monsanto and the EPA

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action: Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with  federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp. The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost- wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto  to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the  EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…