Skip to main content

A State of Transition

April 18, 2011 – Two states of which I have formerly been a resident are enduring weather that nearly defies description. North Carolina experienced 60-plus tornado touchdowns over the past weekend, a large number of them in the Raleigh area, where we used to live. Having grown up in the Midwest, I long since became accustomed to tornadoes as being representative of “typical” spring weather. However, that meant in “Tornado Alley,” a swath of prairie land that ran from Texas up through Wisconsin. While some of the usual places were hard hit this time around – I’m referring here to Oklahoma and Kansas – I don’t think of North Carolina as tornado country. However, my expectations rely upon decades of weather memory that are based on climate behavior that conformed with known patterns and trends. We are now in a transitional period, and the old rules don’t apply. Then there’s Texas. By every account, Texas weather is on a bender, the Forest Service helping to battle 700,000 acres of fires caused by tinder-dry conditions and windy spring weather. Fourteen hundred people are fighting these fires, of which there are currently 42. Some have been caused by lightning, others by careless human behavior. According to one source, as much as half the state is vulnerable to going up in smoke. Hundreds of people have been evacuated, hundreds of homes destroyed, at least 90 head of cattle killed. Weather conditions are predicted to worsen north of San Angelo, where a fire named “Wildcat” is threatening people and property. An anticipated shift in the wind will cause fire lines to become useless. This scenario, or a version of it, has played out 7,807 times during the year’s fire season. All but two of Texas’ 254 counties have been affected by fire. Gov. Perry has asked that Texas be declared a disaster area. In other state news, the Supreme Court will hear a case brought against five power companies by the states of Vermont, Connecticut, California, Iowa, New York, Rhode Island, and – on the city level - New York City, seeking ceilings on GHGE. Since the Court’s ruling in 2007, allowing the EPA to regulate air pollution, the states have been marshaling their forces. Justice Sotomayor is recusing herself, having heard the case as it made its way through the lower courts. If the court splits evenly on the case, it will have the same effect as a ruling in the states’ favor. Finally, Oregon State University scientists have released their findings regarding the ability of American forests to store carbon. It is now believed that American forests can store as much as 40 percent of atmospheric carbon, up from 30 percent. Any particular year’s weather and climate events can influence the percentage, but the consensus is that this is good news. Celebrate Earth Day. Plan to Make a Difference!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Great March for Climate Action

December 23, 2013 – Have you heard about The Great March for Climate Action?   I just learned about it today.   Organizers have determined it will take them 246 days to march from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C.   They are looking for 1,000 people – 20 from each state – to participate.   The march is stopping in many, many locations along the way so that locals can participate for as little as a day, or as long as they like. The march is Ed Fallon’s brainchild.   Ed, along with most of his staff members, is from Iowa, where he served as a state legislator for fourteen years.   He currently hosts a radio program called Fallon Forum.   Fallon began his career as a social activist coordinating the Iowa section of the Great Peace March in 1986.  Ed bases his approach on Great Marches of the past.  Women suffragists marched on Washington on March 3, 1913; Gandhi led the Salt March in India on March 12, 1930; Dr. King led the voting rights march from Selma to Montgomery

Greenland: A State of Rapid Collapse

 September 1, 2020 The good news, such as it is, goes like this: the suspense is over. No need to guess about whether sea level rise will be life-altering by the end of this century or not. It will, at least for the 40 percent of humankind which lives on or near a coastline. That's because all the ice on Greenland is going to melt, according to researchers at Ohio State University (yes, yes, I know - it's THE Ohio State University. Get over yourselves.) Their research appeared in the journal Nature Communications Earth and Environment in August. Total meltdown will take 10,000 years, but enough will have melted by 2100 to cause sea level rise of approximately three feet. That will cover a lot of coastal property, a loss made worse by storms and hurricanes. How have researchers reached this conclusion? By studying almost 40 years of satellite data. Glaciers on Greenland have shrunk so much since the year 2000 that even if global warming came to a complete stop, they would contin