Skip to main content

Is a Half-Truth Really Better than None?

Hi Everybody - Well, once again I must apologize for my tardiness. This time, Google/blogspot isn't allowing me to copy and paste my articles into their posting app, so I had to re-type. Sorry for the delay.

July 4, 2011 - It just keeps getting better: during a meeting of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski (AK) sorrowfully pointed out that, if the Healthy Forest Restoration Act (HFRA) of 2003 had only been fully implemented, the forest fires out West wouldn't be burning. It's all the fault of the Forest Service, she lamented. Come to find out, the HFRA was never - you guessed it - fully funded (as was the case with so many of GWB's "great ideas"). Furthermore, says Roger Sedjo of Resources for the Future, Murkowski, along with other members of the committee, fails to account for the type of forests found in the Southwest - pine. Pine trees have evolved to go to seed as the result of being exposed to the heat of forest fires. I would be remiss in not mentioning Senator Al Franken (D-Minn.), who highlighted the real cause of the fires out West. "It would be all well and good for members to understand that this is related to climate change, and how important it is for us to address and take national action to reduce our carbon emissions." While Senator Franken cannot be lauded for his eloquence, he can for his veracity. Speaking truth to power always matters.

In other news ...

The board of directors of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) has released an open letter, following an incident earlier this month during which Australian university researchers were rushed to a secure location after receiving death threats. In the letter, the directors express their concern about the targeting of climate scientists, saying "Scientists should not be subjected to fraud investigations or harassment simply for providing scientific results that are controversial. AAAS vigorously opposes attacks on researchers that question their personal and professional integrity or threaten their safety based on displeasure with their scientific conclusions." AAAS publishes the journal Science.

Problems do not exist only in Australia. Here in the US, climate researchers have been the object of specious requests for detailed records, made by the American Tradition Institute (ATI). Make up your own mind about ATI by visiting their website. To understand why requests of this type would be considered harassment, you must first understand that the request ATI has made of the University of Virginia is for thousands of emails and documents. Every item must be located and copied. Think about the last time you needed to track down an old email - just one. How long did it take? What did the search keep you from doing that was at least as important? Where thousands of documents are concerned, what kind of recordkeeping would be required, so that all parties concerned know that the request has been fully met? How much would a copier be paid to copy the items? How long would it take? Whose job is it to refile the originals, once they've been copied? Should double copies be generated, based on the assumptionh that the university's legal department will probably need them at some point in the future? Annoying UVa isn't enough, of course; they've gone after James Hansen (of NASA), as well.

They want to know if he's complied with federal ethics and disclosure rules.

Next, I think they should demand to know if Al Gore is keeping his Oscar polished ...


Popular posts from this blog


March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.

Monsanto and the EPA

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action: Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with  federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp. The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost- wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto  to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the  EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…