Skip to main content

A Few Good Websites

February 7, 2012 - Hi everybody, glad to be back at last.  You know, I have friends who are very hip to permaculture, the need to end environmental degradation, and organic farm products, but who still can't get their minds wrapped around climate change.  They can't see it playing out in their town or neighborhood, so what's the worry?  Whenever I find myself talking to such people, I've wished I could whip out a fact like "Don't you realize that over 12,000 climatologists worldwide believe that global warming is a real threat to human existence?"  I still don't have that number at the ready (it's not 12,000 - I made that up), but I have found a website called 100 Top Climate Change Sites - http://www.world.org/weo/climate.  I though I'd give at least some of them a look and tell you what I think.

The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions - http://www.pewclimate.org/ (formerly The Pew Center on Global Climate Change) is ranked number 1 on this list of top climate change sites.  It was named the world's top environmental think tank in a global survey of public policy research institutions for the year 2011.  There is an absolutely outstanding page called "Communicating Climate Change," featuring articles with titles like "Don't Ignore Climate Skeptics - Talk to Them Differently," by Andrew Hoffman, of the Christian Science Monitor; "Communicating about Climate Risks While Avoiding Dire Messaging," by Matthew C. Nisbet of big think; and "The Scientific Guide to Global Warming Skepticism," by John Cook of Skeptical Science.

Number 6 on the list is the Environmental Protection Agency - http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/index.html.  Under the "Basic Information" link, there is a video called Climate 101, an excellent introduction to the subject.  The "Science" page includes information about the government's role in researching climate change, with links to reports such as "Global Climate Change Impacts on the United States" and "IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation."

Unfortunately, number 10 on the list, "What's Up With the Weather? (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/warming/),"
is badly out of date, having first been shown on PBS in 2000.  Furthermore, the issue is over-politicized by the use of quotes by Vice President Al Gore and a representative of the Western Fuels Association.  While I'm sure this program was, at one time, groundbreaking, there are much better visual media on the subject available today.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National Weather Service hosts site no. 15, the Climate Prediction Center (CPC) - http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/.  The CPC deals with up-to-the-minute information needed for predicting long-term impacts on the United States' weather.  The tone is pretty cut-and-dry, but for many - like farmers - who need serious, reliable information about what lies ahead, the information found here is critically important.  The "La Nina Advisory Continues" link is closely related to the ongoing droughts in Texas and New Mexico.

Of the 5 websites listed here, my absolute favorite is no. 73, operated by the Union for Concerned Scientists - http://www.ucsusa.org/.  These folks are truth-tellers, and I like that.  Here's what they have to say about scientific intergrity:

"Political interference in federal government science is weakening our nation's ability to respond to the complex challenges we face.  Because policy makers depend on impartial research to make informed decisions, we are mobilizing scientists and citizens alike to push for reforms that will enable our leaders to fully protect our health, safety, and environment."  I'd be happy to have them speak for me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Truly, There's Nothing to be Afraid of

February 26, 2013 – The 1960s scared conservatives worse than I knew – worse than a lot of us knew, I guess.   Certainly I lived through that period.   Certainly young adults found their voices, and had the nerve to object to being put through the meat grinder called Vietnam.   Black Americans continued to seek justice and equality in their adopted homeland.   Change was inevitable.   It’s understandable that conservatives wanted a say in what those changes would be.   Their fearful reaction was – and is - badly overblown.   Others’ happiness is nothing to fear.     These longed-for changes cost conservatives nothing but their unearned, self-satisfied atrophy.   Young people went on dying, even so. It turns out all of that change scared the socks off market fundamentalists.   Determined to return the country to its previous perceived state of inertia, Lewis Powell wrote a memorandum for the US Chamber of Commerce, urging a sh...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...