Skip to main content

Hoist on Their Lying Petard


May 21, 2012 - Don't you just love it when justice prevails?  When right makes might?  When the perps get caught red-handed?  I know I do, and so it is with great, if inappropriate, glee that I inform you of a mass departure of both donors and staff from the Heartland Institute (HI).  The Unabomber billboard has proved to be their downfall, if not their undoing.  In fact, Heartland has lost more than 35% of pledged but uncollected funds for the year 2012, according to the campaign group Forecast the Facts.  In an admirable attempt at piling on, Forecast is urging corporate donors to boycott Heartland.

Not only have funds suddenly dried up, but staffers at Heartland's Washington, D.C. office have exited in disgust, putting an end to a major project overseen by Eli Lehrer, the former Washington office director.  Lehrer, who has himself resigned, lost all but one of his office staff in the billboard brouhaha.  As a result,
Heartland's much touted "climate conference," which opened today in Chicago, was forced to look for last-minute sponsors.  The Illinois Coal Association and the Heritage Foundation came to the Institute's rescue, thereby undermining Heartland's claim of independence from the fossil fuel industry.  Certainly a conflict of interest exists.

It's hard to imagine that Peter Gleick isn't smiling - at least a little bit - at this latest news regarding HI.  You may recall that, back in February, Gleick admitted to obtaining internal Heartland documents by posing as a board member of the Institute over the phone.  The documents supplied to Gleick by means of the subterfuge included a list of donors, and plans being developed for the purpose of confusing school children about climate change.  Donors value their anonymity, and a number of them resigned, following the revelation.  General Motors was undoubtedly the most prominent.  Due to the ethically suspect manner in which Gleick went about obtaining the documents, he suffered professional and personal embarrassment when disclosing the information.

Gleick's problems were compounded when HI insisted that two pages of the material in his possession had been forged.  Dr. Gleick temporarily stepped aside from his job as head of the Pacific Institute, a research organization he founded, so that the charge could be investigated.  Results of the investigation, exonerating Dr. Gleick of all charges of forgery, were made known earlier today.  It is not yet known when he will return to work at the Pacific Institute.

The Heartland Institute has unwittingly made itself a known quantity.  By revealing only a passing acquaintance with decency, by operating in so opaque a manner that even its donors and directors were unaware of the underhanded methods it employs, and by lying about documents it authored but of which it was ashamed, the Heartland Institute has shown itself to be a climate denial representative with which only the right-wing fringe will choose to consort.

It's a great day for Truth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...