Skip to main content

A Future with Fewer of Us in It


September 13, 2013 – There are now almost countless articles, scientific studies, and books about climate change, many of them dealing with how the world will have changed as a result of climate change.  Many of them give reason for hope, perhaps even more reason for consternation.  All are good at describing various causes and effects as if they were happening in isolation from one another.  Very few bother to mention that, no matter what life is like in a climatically-changed world, it will be lived in the midst of utterly wretched weather.  It’s not that some things will be harder to do.  Everything will be much, much harder to do.

When I get out my crystal ball and try to imagine what life will be like during the latter half of the twenty-first century, I feel pretty confident about one thing.  While it should be a surprise to no one, it’s hard to put into words, due to its sheer awfulness.  Millions of people will die.  (You may need to reread that sentence several times.  It says so much in so few words.)  As a result, Americans will relearn what they once knew about death.  It will happen at home and on the road, by disease or by accident.  People will drown because of floods.  People will collapse due to heat stroke.  It seems likely that environmental immigrants will have to fight in order to gain a foothold in a new land.  We will once again die because of a lack of vaccines and antibiotics.

Those who die will tend to be very young or very old.  As for the rest, I think they will live as extended families, all together under one roof.  When they travel, I think it will be by bicycle or horse or horse-and-buggy.  Their economy will be local.  They will live at close to a subsistence level.  After that, the picture gets much vaguer, at least for me.  Will power come from wind turbines, or from solar panels?  What about wind and hail – can the turbines and panels survive these?  What about the western United States – will drought and fire have rendered it uninhabitable?  Does that mean the eastern U.S. will get a lot more crowded, or will people move to Canada?

What about bullet trains?  What about the smart grid?  What about electric cars?  What about the Internet?  What about smart phones?  What about nonstop music?  Actually, I don’t care about the answers to the last three, but I know a lot of people do.  It will all depend on the weather: the bullet trains, the smart grid, electric cars AND the Internet.  Then again, if we need to repair things endlessly, I suppose that could be viewed as job security, at least for some!  Whether or not people will perform the actual repairs, or if they will need to make robots who repair roads and electric lines and bullet trains because human beings are unable to endure the severe weather …

I don’t think it’s a pointless exercise to attempt to ready ourselves for an arduous future.  I certainly don’t think it’s pointless to learn how people managed to survive in pre-modern times.  Of course, whatever we prepare for will turn out to be different from what the future actually holds.  That’s ok, though – we’ll at least have learned to think in terms of radical change and how to manage it.   Nothing will make the future easy.  We will need to learn gratitude for simply having one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...