Skip to main content

Mutually-Assured Survival


December 2, 2013 – If such a thing is possible, I think countries have grown bored with their own inertia vis-à-vis slowing climate change.  The sense one gets, in reading about the lack of progress at yet another Cop Conference is that, unless the next meeting is held in a place and at a time when a Haiyan-sized typhoon will disrupt the proceedings, very little will get done any time soon.  Since climate change is generally perceived as a time-sensitive issue, I present this as further evidence of our world’s self-inflicted dysfunction.

Can businesses do what nations cannot?  Peter Bakker, president of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), says that yes, businesses (plural) can and must come together to collaborate on a mutual agenda designed to slow climate change and, simultaneously, develop renewable energy.  The Council was much in evidence in Warsaw, sponsoring its own conference of member companies and organizational participants during the Cop Conference.  Two hundred corporate members that include companies like Siemens, Philips, Unilever, Canon, KPMG, Deutsche Bank and Nissan have teamed up with environmental NGO’s such as the Stockholm Resilience Center, Caring for the Climate, and the World Resources Institute.

WBCSD’s agenda looks to set the pace for business action on sustainable development through 2020, and beyond.  Forty of its member companies, in consultation with 800 scientists – no denial here! – have selected business priorities that sound a lot like human priorities: food, water, ecosystems, exposure to harmful substances, and climate change.   Quantifiable, measurable goals will be determined, foremost among them not allowing the global temperature to exceed two degrees centigrade above preindustrial levels.  Add to this monumental task the merely herculean effort to bring electricity to the 1.8 billion people in the world who do not have it.

Solutions have been conceptually identified, even if the particulars have yet to be worked out.  The WBCSD will develop renewable energy sources in remote areas, plant entire forests to act as sponges that will soak up excess carbon dioxide, and perform further research in the areas of carbon capture and storage.  Member companies say they are ready to begin implementation of these strategies.  Bakker says the reason is simple: “Business is recognizing that the cost of inaction, the cost of not dealing with climate change, is getting larger than the cost of action.”



With thanks to blogs.telegraph.co.uk .


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wildfires

March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.

Monsanto and the EPA

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action: Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with  federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp. The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost- wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto  to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the  EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…