Skip to main content

The End of Deforestation


I like Ban Ki-Moon, UN Secretary General.  He doesn’t just talk about doing things; he makes things happen.  I refer specifically to a new collaboration between the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).  These two organizations intend to restore at least 150 million hectares of forest by 2020 (a hectare is slightly more than 2 acres).  Their joint effort will be announced at the Secretary-General’s Climate Summit on September 23, 2014.

Restoring 150 million hectares of forest, an area about the size of Alaska, would sequester roughly 1 gigaton of carbon dioxide and/or the equivalent thereof every year, reducing the current emissions gap by 11 – 17 percent.  The target date of 2020 is ambitious, but would generate US$85 billion per year in ecosystem services that would benefit the rural poor all 
over the world.

The rate of global deforestation has slowed significantly since the beginning of the 21st century.  However, we still lose 13 million hectares a year (an area the size of Greece).  The willingness of nations rich and poor to sign onto this program is due in large part to the growing realization that forests provide services that could very nearly be termed “priceless.”  Among them are rainfall creation, carbon removal from the atmosphere, storing and purifying water, maintaining soil quality, providing rich habitat, and species maintenance.

Brazil can be cited as an outstanding example of declining deforestation.  It decreased by 70 percent between 2005 and 2013.  This has been due in large part to a moratorium agreed to by the soy and beef industries.  The country has agreed to an 80 percent reduction by 2020.  The Union of Concerned Scientists says that Brazil has “already made a very large contribution to combating climate change – more than that of any other nation on Earth.  For this … Brazil can rightfully be very proud.”  It bears pointing out that, prior to the moratorium, Brazil was the world’s leading contributor to changing climate.

Glenn Hurowitz, of the American consultancy group Climate Advisers and its activist arm, Catapult, is quoted as saying, “ … in some countries we are winning battles against the war on trees … I think it is the beginning of the end.  There are countries where forests are actually regrowing, including Europe, the US, India, China, Vietnam, and even some in Africa.”  Anti-deforestation pledges made by food giants Wilmar, Unilever, and most recently Cargill point to a paradigm shift.

May this be the beginning of a new activism on the part of participant nations and corporations.


With thanks to independent.co.uk and unep.org.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

The Land of the Rising Sea

Sept. 26, 2015 -  Shinzo Abe, the Prime Minister of Japan, pushed a bill through the lower house of   Parliament last week which authorizes expansion of the military in Japan.   Japan was shorn of its military subsequent to World War II and today, the move is not a popular one amongst the Japanese.   They have grown unaccustomed to bearing responsibility for a well-armed military.   It will cost Japan a lot of money, for one thing.   In addition, the island nation is not well known for friendly relations with its neighbors.   The United States, however, supports the move, since it can ill afford to continue in its post-war role as world policeman.   Help from an ally would be very welcome. Japan’s primary motivation is China’s growing military.  The actual building of islands in the South China Sea has disturbed all of China’s neighbors, with good reason.  It would appear their purpose in creating the islands could w...