Skip to main content

One Very Small Step for Humankind

March 25, 2015 - I recall, back in the early 1970's, the constant stream of news stories telling Americans that virtually every new product recently developed contained something that caused cancer.  Honestly, it was hard to know what to do with the information.  I think because there were so many stories - several a week, it seemed like - there was also a lot of skepticism.  All these years later, I will confess we should have demanded that the products be pulled from the shelves.  We didn't, and now we pay the price with our own lives, and the lives of our children and grandchildren.

I volunteer at the elementary school's library.  The librarian, incredibly competent and caring, is also the mother of two daughters.  Her younger child has had to be treated twice for leukemia.  The second go-round was caused by the first; yes, that's what I'm saying - the chemotherapy caused her to contract leukemia for a second time.  In all likelihood, chemicals in the environment gave it to her the first time.  Chemicals deliberately fed into her bloodstream to fight the cancer gave it to her the second time.  Miraculously, she is still with us and, for the time being, she is cancer free.  She will always be short, because the chemo has stunted her growth.  Never mind; she is bright and beautiful.

Now we are told by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), an arm of the World Health Organization (WHO), that glyphosate, a.k.a. Roundup, "probably causes cancer in human beings."  You know that Monsanto makes Roundup.  Other companies also make products containing glyphosate as the active ingredient.  Not quite so well known is that weeds have become Roundup-resistant; some farmers' fields contain weeds half of which - that's 50% - are resistant to Roundup.

Here's the part where, if you have any sense, you should be very scared: because of this resistance, more and more Roundup is being used.  Since 1996, more than 500 million pounds in addition to what was originally called for has been used in the United States.  In 2013, Monsanto requested and received approval from the EPA for increased tolerance levels IN HUMAN BEINGS for glyphosate.  In the case of Dow Chemical, super weeds will be targeted with seeds branded Enlist, which can tolerate the use of a glyphosate/2,4-D [Agent Orange] mixture.  To put it in simplest terms, there is no end in sight.

Too young to remember Agent Orange?  Allow me to explain.  Agent Orange was used on a spectacular scale as a defoliant during the Vietnam War.  Causing trees to lose their leaves ostensibly permitted the Air Force to more easily pick out and kill the Viet Cong, as North Vietnamese soldiers were called.  Decades later, men who had served in Vietnam began dying of cancers caused by the individual's exposure to Agent Orange.  Our neighbor in North Carolina died a hideously painful death from brain cancer caused by Agent Orange.

If it is not yet clear to you, then let's state it for the record: manufacturers of products containing glyphosate and 2,4-D don't give a rat's ass if you die of cancer.  They don't give a rat's ass if members of their own families die of cancer.  By that, I mean specifically their own children.  THEY DON'T CARE.  Do no expect them to care.  The only way they will care is if they cease to make obscene amounts of money by selling these products.  Join the Pesticide Action Network, and tell the EPA to stop working hand-in-hand with companies like Monsanto and Dow Chemical.  And for the love of God, eat organic foods.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Truly, There's Nothing to be Afraid of

February 26, 2013 – The 1960s scared conservatives worse than I knew – worse than a lot of us knew, I guess.   Certainly I lived through that period.   Certainly young adults found their voices, and had the nerve to object to being put through the meat grinder called Vietnam.   Black Americans continued to seek justice and equality in their adopted homeland.   Change was inevitable.   It’s understandable that conservatives wanted a say in what those changes would be.   Their fearful reaction was – and is - badly overblown.   Others’ happiness is nothing to fear.     These longed-for changes cost conservatives nothing but their unearned, self-satisfied atrophy.   Young people went on dying, even so. It turns out all of that change scared the socks off market fundamentalists.   Determined to return the country to its previous perceived state of inertia, Lewis Powell wrote a memorandum for the US Chamber of Commerce, urging a sh...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...