Skip to main content

New World Environmental Leader?

March 5, 2017 - China's coal consumption dropped for the third year in a row in 2016.  This, coupled with the country's shift away from heavy industry, could well portend cleaner air and water. As you know, cleaner air in China means cleaner air everywhere. With a population of 1.35 billion people, China currently produces twice as much carbon dioxide in the form of emissions as the United States.

Given that the US has a population less than 1/4 the size of China's, their emissions would quadruple our own, if their standard of living matched ours. Thank goodness it doesn't. Be aware, however, that the government of China is transitioning to an economy based on consumer spending. That could spell trouble.

In the meantime, China's National Bureau of Statistics indicates that China's coal consumption fell by 4.7 percent in 2016. Coal's share of total energy consumed fell to 62% in 2016, from 64% in 2015. In the United States, by contrast, the government pledges to restart the American coal industry. As of February this year, coal companies may once again dump mining waste into streams and waterways. The Trump administration claims 77,000 jobs will be saved because of this change, a number widely viewed with skepticism.

As crazy as it sounds, Trump has called climate change a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese. Scott Pruitt, the new director of the Environmental Protection Agency, plans to free fossil fuel companies from the need to report methane emissions. Methane has a global warming potential more than 2500% greater than that of carbon dioxide.

While China has begun a $474 billion renewable energy program, with huge wind and solar farms under construction, close to one fifth of current capacity goes to waste, due to the inability to connect energy farms to the grid. "I think people here can't wait … long before solving the air pollution problem, so I think the domestic pressure itself is already large enough for China to take action," a Chinese climate change specialist was quoted as saying.

China has long ordered the closing of small, inefficient coal mines. It far exceeded its goal of eliminating 250 million tons in excess capacity last year. Construction plans for 103 coal-fired power plants were cancelled in January of this year. Resulting unemployment will need to be addressed. As we have learned here at home, retraining will provide part of the solution to that problem.

With my thanks to The Christian Science Monitor, and China correspondent Bill Birtles

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...