Skip to main content

The SunShot Initiative

In 2007, the amount of solar power installed in the U.S. was 1.1 gigawatts (GW). As of 2017, that amount has increased to 47.1 GW. Enough to power 9.1 million average American homes. If you're thinking "we've still got a long way to go," you'd be right. On the other hand, increasing installed power by 4300% deserves some attention.  How'd we do it?

The Department of Energy played an important role. In 2011, they initiated a program called The SunShot Initiative. They set targets for the years 2020 and 2030, by which times generating solar power would have become more affordable. More affordable on a utility scale, more affordable on a commercial scale, and more affordable on a residential scale. Thus far, they've succeeded in hitting the 2020 goal for utility-scale generation. Needless to mention, they reached that goal three years early. The goals, it should be mentioned, don't take subsidies into account. It's the technology, in the case of utilities, that's become more cost effective. Photovoltaic hardware has become cheaper, module efficiency has increased, and labor costs have declined.

How are the goals tested? Cost estimates are based on systems installed in an "average" solar location: Kansas City, Mo. The targets agreed upon for 2020 are 6 cents /kWh for utilities, 8 cents/
kWh for businesses, and 10 cents/kWh for residences. The 6 cents/kWh target has been achieved. Because wholesale power prices have been very nearly flat, and even declined, from 2010 to 2017, the utility goal was not adjusted for inflation. What's the 2030 goal for utility-scale generation? Three cents/kWh. Commercial and residential targets are 4 cents and 5 cents, respectively.

If longer-range goals can be achieved (grid integration, two-way power flow, increased demand response, optimal charging of electric vehicles), and combined with low-cost battery storage, solar power could be deployed nationwide. A a new energy balance among distinct energy sources emerges, the ability to integrate them will be key.

First, however, the slower decline in residential and commercial costs needs to be taken into account. Soft costs like sales taxes and overhead continue to drive up the cost of residential installations. The Department of Energy has said these expenses will be halved in the future. The biggest obstacle? Converting DC solar power to AC network power, known as inversion.  Without reliable inverter technology, as much as 50 percent of power is lost during inversion.

We're just a few inventions away from the new solar reality.



With thanks to Oilprice.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...