Skip to main content

Dicamba Drift and the Monsanto Merger

March 15, 2018 -
A lesson in evolution: When farmers spray weed killer on their fields, there will always be a small number of weeds that survive. They have a natural resistance to the weed killer in their genetic makeup. Those are the weeds that go to seed that year, their children producing a crop of herbicide-resistant weeds the following year. By the next year, the farmer's fields are producing more and more herbicide-resistant weeds. What's a farmer to do? For those unwise enough to remain on the chemical treadmill, there's only one solution. Buy a stronger weed killer - to which a small number of weeds will, inevitably, be resistant.

This is precisely what happened to farmers that use Monsanto's weed-killer, RoundUp.  Monsanto's low-cost, highly ineffective solution to RoundUp-resistant weeds was to sell these farmers Dicamba, an old chemical weed killer with a tendency to drift. When pesticides travel on the wind, or drift, they damage crops and human health. Last year, farmers in the South and Midwest reported extensive crop damage as a result of Dicamba drift. Monsanto even had the chutzpah to develop Dicamba-resistant seeds, called by the product name Xtend, so that farmers would be lulled into a false sense of security. Problem is, those same farmers keep using more and more Dicamba to kill Dicamba-resistant weeds. All that Dicamba is doing a lot of crop damage, just like its predecessor RoundUp did. It's also making Monsanto a lot of money.

Perhaps you've read that Bayer (a German company) and Monsanto want to merge into a super-colossal chemical company. Farmers asked about the merger don't like the idea. Almost a thousand of them, in 48 states, were asked what they thought. They responded by expressing concern about increasing pressure to practice chemical-dependent farming, coupled with a reduced choice in seeds and supplies. The President of the National Farmers Union, Roger Johnson, said the merger would result in a decrease in fair pricing [for crops], a decrease in the choice of what to plant, and market competition that would depress competition and innovation.

Also reported in the survey, more than 70% of farmers report heavier herbicide use due to resistant weeds. Worse yet, over 90% of organic farmers fear that Dicamba drift will affect their ability to continue to farm organically. Please go to the Department of Justice's website at www.justice.gov and express your objections to the Bayer-Monsanto merger. Why? Because they want to own as much of the food chain as possible. These are positively not the people we want in charge.

With thanks to the Pesticide Action Network.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Great March for Climate Action

December 23, 2013 – Have you heard about The Great March for Climate Action?   I just learned about it today.   Organizers have determined it will take them 246 days to march from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C.   They are looking for 1,000 people – 20 from each state – to participate.   The march is stopping in many, many locations along the way so that locals can participate for as little as a day, or as long as they like. The march is Ed Fallon’s brainchild.   Ed, along with most of his staff members, is from Iowa, where he served as a state legislator for fourteen years.   He currently hosts a radio program called Fallon Forum.   Fallon began his career as a social activist coordinating the Iowa section of the Great Peace March in 1986.  Ed bases his approach on Great Marches of the past.  Women suffragists marched on Washington on March 3, 1913; Gandhi led the Salt March in India on March 12, 1930; Dr. King led the voting rights march from Selma to Montgomery

Greenland: A State of Rapid Collapse

 September 1, 2020 The good news, such as it is, goes like this: the suspense is over. No need to guess about whether sea level rise will be life-altering by the end of this century or not. It will, at least for the 40 percent of humankind which lives on or near a coastline. That's because all the ice on Greenland is going to melt, according to researchers at Ohio State University (yes, yes, I know - it's THE Ohio State University. Get over yourselves.) Their research appeared in the journal Nature Communications Earth and Environment in August. Total meltdown will take 10,000 years, but enough will have melted by 2100 to cause sea level rise of approximately three feet. That will cover a lot of coastal property, a loss made worse by storms and hurricanes. How have researchers reached this conclusion? By studying almost 40 years of satellite data. Glaciers on Greenland have shrunk so much since the year 2000 that even if global warming came to a complete stop, they would contin