Skip to main content

Greenland: A State of Rapid Collapse

 September 1, 2020

The good news, such as it is, goes like this: the suspense is over. No need to guess about whether sea level rise will be life-altering by the end of this century or not. It will, at least for the 40 percent of humankind which lives on or near a coastline. That's because all the ice on Greenland is going to melt, according to researchers at Ohio State University (yes, yes, I know - it's THE Ohio State University. Get over yourselves.) Their research appeared in the journal Nature Communications Earth and Environment in August. Total meltdown will take 10,000 years, but enough will have melted by 2100 to cause sea level rise of approximately three feet. That will cover a lot of coastal property, a loss made worse by storms and hurricanes.

How have researchers reached this conclusion? By studying almost 40 years of satellite data. Glaciers on Greenland have shrunk so much since the year 2000 that even if global warming came to a complete stop, they would continue to melt. You see, as long as the amount of snow that falls on Greenland exceeds or equals the amount of ice that melts during the summer, sea level rise is of no concern. However, according to Michalea King, lead author of  the OSU Byrd Polar and Climate Research Center report, " . . . ice that's discharging into the ocean is far surpassing the snow that's accumulating on the surface of the ice sheet." The amount of ice being lost annually comes to 500 gigatons (a gigaton equals a billion tons), as opposed to 450 gigatons prior to 2000.

That's a lot of ice melt. In fact, Greenland's melting glaciers presently contribute more than a millimeter rise in sea level each year. Last year, enough ice melted or broke off that the oceans rose 2.2 millimeters in just two months! The OSU study also reveals that large glaciers across Greenland have retreated about 3 kilometers on average since 1985. Many of them now sit in ocean water, the warmth of which causes them to melt more quickly. "Glacier retreat has knocked the dynamics of the whole ice sheet into a constant state of loss," according to Ian Howat, a co-author on the paper. "Even if the climate were to stay the same or even get a little colder, the ice sheet would still be losing mass." Combined with the phenomenon of albedo, whereby light-colored surfaces (like snow) reflect the sun's warmth, and dark-colored surfaces (like ocean and land) absorb it, there is little chance of a decrease in ice melt.

Knowing what to expect may help us in preparing for what lies ahead. How much better it would be if we would work to prevent catastrophes like the collapse of Greenland's glaciers. There's only a little time left.


With thanks to Axios, Cnn.com, and phys.org.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Truly, There's Nothing to be Afraid of

February 26, 2013 – The 1960s scared conservatives worse than I knew – worse than a lot of us knew, I guess.   Certainly I lived through that period.   Certainly young adults found their voices, and had the nerve to object to being put through the meat grinder called Vietnam.   Black Americans continued to seek justice and equality in their adopted homeland.   Change was inevitable.   It’s understandable that conservatives wanted a say in what those changes would be.   Their fearful reaction was – and is - badly overblown.   Others’ happiness is nothing to fear.     These longed-for changes cost conservatives nothing but their unearned, self-satisfied atrophy.   Young people went on dying, even so. It turns out all of that change scared the socks off market fundamentalists.   Determined to return the country to its previous perceived state of inertia, Lewis Powell wrote a memorandum for the US Chamber of Commerce, urging a sh...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...