Skip to main content

July 4, 2009 – My apologies, once again, for the dark print.

You know, Cincinnati has the reputation of being 10 years behind the rest of the country. That reputation is well earned, in my opinion. It came to the fore on yesterday’s Op Ed page of The Cincinnati Enquirer. The newspaper, like the area it serves, is a bit stodgy and fairly conservative. It’s not a bad paper, though the quality of journalism, like everywhere else, continues the general trend downward. So I guess I shouldn’t have been surprised when I read Peter Bronson’s column regarding the energy bill passed by the House this week. Bronson contends the bill is “awful,” and besides, it addresses a problem “that might happen in 100 years – if ever.”

Good grief - where to start. Mr. Bronson fails to grasp that the members of Congress who wrote the bill are experts on the subject. They have many years of studying the subject under their belts. How could they have had all that time to study? Why, thanks to the Bush II, Clinton, Bush I, and Reagan administrations, that’s ALL they’ve been able to do, because those presidents refused to take their brave pills and Do the Right Thing: address the problem! The bill has probably appeared in committee in many forms over the years. We are now the beneficiaries of their expertise.

As for problems arising as a result of the use of fossil fuels in 100 years, is it really possible that Bronson is unaware of the fact that Cincinnati has the third worst air quality of all the cities in the United States? It was reported in his newspaper! Is it possible he knows no one who suffers from asthma? What about his own children and grandchildren and THEIR future? Can it be possible he has no desire to leave them better off than they are now? Is being better off really only a function of how much money a person makes?

Ok, I’ve gotten that out of my system. On to more important matters. In fact, the House DID pass the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. I’m positive there are all sorts of give-aways to energy utilities for developing nuclear energy, not something any of us other than the utilities will want to celebrate. But there are lots of dollars for the research and development of alternative energy, as well. Goodness knows what the bill will look like by the time it gets through the Senate. Now would be a good time to let your senators know what you would like to see in the bill.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The SunShot Initiative

In 2007, the amount of solar power installed in the U.S. was 1.1 gigawatts (GW). As of 2017, that amount has increased to 47.1 GW. Enough to power 9.1 million average American homes. If you're thinking "we've still got a long way to go," you'd be right. On the other hand, increasing installed power by 4300% deserves some attention.  How'd we do it?

The Department of Energy played an important role. In 2011, they initiated a program called The SunShot Initiative. They set targets for the years 2020 and 2030, by which times generating solar power would have become more affordable. More affordable on a utility scale, more affordable on a commercial scale, and more affordable on a residential scale. Thus far, they've succeeded in hitting the 2020 goal for utility-scale generation. Needless to mention, they reached that goal three years early. The goals, it should be mentioned, don't take subsidies into account. It's the technology, in the case of util…

The Future Has Arrived

September 4, 2017 - Wildfires are burning throughout the Pacific Northwest. Hurricane Harvey has decimated the greater Houston area and parts of Louisiana. Hurricane Irma glowers out in the Atlantic. In other words, forecasts made decades ago are proving accurate. Four hundred parts per million of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was regarded as a tipping point, the point at which climate change would take on a life of its own. If no one ever drove their car another block, if farmers never used another ounce of chemical fertilizer, if not so much as one more acre of land was cleared with fire, climate change would continue on its way, wreaking havoc.

We passed four hundred ppm this year. I'm not sure where we stand right now; we were supposed to be at around 410 by spring. I'm not advocating giving up. Of course not. We must still - and at this point, will, whether we want to or not - consciously lower our standard of living, and stop enjoying the conveniences for which we are…