Skip to main content

June 30, 2009 – First of all, my apologies for the dark print in my last post. I realize this is very difficult to read. I’m not sure what caused this! Perhaps enlarging the font will make it easier to read. Again, I’m sorry that happened.

I referred, in my last post, to the Sahara and Gobi Deserts. When I said they were advancing I meant, of course, that they were expanding. The expansion, in both cases, is caused by irrigation and animal grazing, activities associated with farming. Different types of land can support different amounts of irrigation and grazing. Clay soils, sandy soils, cannot support as much as top soil containing humus. Dry soils which are over-irrigated become salty, then parched. Over-grazed land gradually loses the vegetation that holds soil in place. An over-abundance of these activities occurs when too many people are trying to eke a living out of soil meant to support fewer people. The result is desertification.

This is what has taken place in both Africa and China. In each case, the decision has been made to fight back by planting trees. I don’t believe that the long-term results are yet known. The thinking, of course, is that the roots of the trees will stabilize the soil, thus preventing it from blowing away. Furthermore, the roots will form a vegetative mass below the ground over time. The roots and the trees they support will also hold water. Ultimately, the hope is that other plants will take root, allowing the stabilization process to progress. When this occurs, desertification has been reversed. The long-term solution to this problem must also include a decrease in the number of people farming marginal lands.


Popular posts from this blog


March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.

Monsanto and the EPA

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action: Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with  federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp. The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost- wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto  to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the  EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…