Skip to main content
March 1 – I’ve been looking at “green” job sites lately. There are a bunch of them out there, which is heartening. I ran across a couple of clunkers, but I also ran across a couple of really good sites. Let’s start with them.

You could do a lot worse than begin your search at www.sustainablebusiness.com.
While green jobs are posted in higher numbers than I found at any other site, you will
also find green news articles, press releases, green investing opportunities, a “Green
Week in Review” podcast, a green events calendar, and a “Resources” category. This
last feature connects you to links of various kinds: agriculture/organics, ecotourism, building design, forests, and waste reduction, to name a few. Each heading is followed by lists of organization websites serving that particular field.

As for your job hunt, searching by location, skill level, kind of job, and/or keyword
are all options. Internships and volunteer positions can also be found.

Another excellent site for you to consider is www.greenbiz.com. Greenbiz also offers myriad
ways to learn more about green business: a “newswire” provides the researcher with ample
articles about who or what is making green news; links to blogs, events, RSS, newsletters, twitter, video, podcasts and job opportunities; and the ability to search their bookstore, utilize tools, and link to organizations, organizational reports, and professional services. This would be an outstanding digital offering for the individual already employed in the field.

Two other sites worth a look are www.cleantechrecruits.com and www.greenjobs.com. Clean tech offers the opportunity to search a category called entry-level jobs, and green jobs has a category for recycling supply/trading. There is a directory in green jobs for green business resources, green government resources, and green associations.

Perhaps it’s unfair for me to call the next two sites clunkers; they had a lot to offer job seekers, but I’ll issue this caveat: neither site did a good job of weeding out bad hits, i.e., job descriptions that contain the word “green” in them somewhere (frequently the location), but that are not, in fact, describing jobs involved with reducing waste or caring for the environment. Keep this in mind when you visit www.greatgreencareers.com and
www.allenvironmentaljobs.com.

One last recommendation. Check out the State of Green Business Report 2010 at the Greenbiz
site. It appears to be very thorough, with up-to-the-minute information on the many sectors of the business world. You can download the report, or read individual sector chapters online. I found lots of easy-to-understand information about the smart grid in the first chapter. What, in many cases, government has failed to attempt, business is making happen. It turns out that waste doesn’t make economic sense, after all.

As Obama quietly creates a new Climate Services agency, and procures funding for upgrading the health of the Great Lakes; while Wal Mart tells its thousands of vendors they must toe the environmental line, and one major business after another creates products that are capable of making use of the Smart Grid, things are getting incrementally better. Too little, too late? Probably. But at least not “never at all.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...