Skip to main content

What Scientists Say, What People Endure

August 2, 2010 – It seems a barrage of earthshaking information is being loosed upon us these days. First the report of the International Polar Year Oslo Science Conference, in which Arctic scientists state that a feedback loop has been established that allows climate change to perpetuate itself. Last week, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) issued their annual report. I haven’t read the report in its entirety; it’s 218 pages long. Realizing that lay people would find the whole report onerous to read, the NOAA was kind enough to issue an executive summary of the report simultaneously (what they refer to as “Highlights”). It is a vitally important document – too late in coming, critically important nonetheless. I’d like to point out what I view as constituting the very core of the report, the information around which the rest of the report revolves.

On page two of The State of the Climate, 2009: Highlights, the authors (of which there are more than 300, from 48 countries) begin, beneath the heading “How we know the world has warmed” by saying “A comprehensive review of key climate indicators … all tell the same story: global warming is undeniable.” Finally! An American organization with the chutzpah to put it in print. The evidence, as they present it, IS undeniable. Those key indicators, of which there are ten in all, include surface air temperature, humidity, sea surface temperature, the amount of sea ice, and ocean heat content. Graphs on page three depict the obvious: while temperatures are going up, snow cover, glaciers, and sea ice are disappearing.

On page four we learn that “Recent studies show … more than 90 percent of the warming that’s happened on earth during the past 50 years has gone into the oceans.” Sea level rise, occurring at slightly more than 1/8 in./yr., is the result of the oceans’ warm waters expanding, accompanied by increasing water volume, a result of land-based ice melting. The oceans will retain their increased warmth for some time, because water maintains its temperature more steadily than the air. Finally, on page five, under the heading “Decade-to-Decade Warming,” the report tells us that “Each of the last three decades has been much warmer than the decade before it, with each one setting a new and significant record for the highest global temperature.” The remaining pages contain less important, though still interesting, information.

You can find the report in both these places:
Arndt, D. S., M. O. Baringer, and M. R. Johnson, Eds., 2010: State of the Climate in 2009. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91 (6), S1-S224, and
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/bams-state-of-the-climate .

In the meantime, there has been a summer-long heat wave in many places across the globe. The parched landscape in Russia is tinder dry. Fires rage out of control, and five hundred villages have been evacuated. California is also ablaze during what has now become known as the “fire season.” Flooding in Pakistan has taken 1,500 lives. Flooding in China has long since reached historic proportions, with 38 million people displaced by it. Our local Fox channel now includes, as part of the 10:00 news, a segment called “Extreme Weather.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...