Skip to main content

Book Review: A Nation of Farmers

August 30, 2010 - BOOK REVIEW. A Nation of Farmers, by Sharon Astyk
and Aaron Newton. 2009. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
This is a terribly important book, packed with information. Its co-authors take turns writing chapters, and while their styles are – as you would expect – a bit different, the difference isn’t great enough to be jarring. Sad to say, the book is poorly edited. That’s nothing new anymore, but the missing words, wrong forms of the right words
(i.e., considerable/considerate), and general lack of understanding with regard to the need for punctuation can all be distracting.
That having been said, the authors have created a book which will serve as an important reference in times to come. Their observations are gleaned from lives spent gardening and/or farming. Among them, the observation that 2,000 acres farmed by 500 individuals yields a great deal more than 2,000 acres farmed by one individual – or corporation. My own observation: people who farm absolutely must be close to the land! Friends and I listened to Gene Logsdon make this very point recently. When migrant workers do the important work of harvesting, they know far more about what’s been produced than the farmer.
They also make the very necessary point that industrialized organic farming is not at all the same thing as organic farming. And I quote: “The word ‘small’ here is the operative one.” Indeed it is. People who sit in the air-conditioned cab of a $100,000.00 tractor find it difficult to see what’s happening down there on the ground. Enormous tractors compact the soil. Compacted soil cannot support microbial life because it’s been crushed. Current Midwestern soils harbor only 1-2% carbon, where 20 years ago they contained as much as 20%. Industrialized organic farming does nothing to build soil.
All is not lost, however. Astyk and Newton believe that people who grow and cook their own food will be the hope of our nation. Both activities will be rather grand adventures for lots of people who neither garden nor cook. My 25-year-old son recently thanked me for not using a microwave to prepare dinners when he was growing up – he said that, unlike his friends, he realizes that cooking is a possibility! There’s lots of practical, homegrown advice in this book about both the growing and the cooking, with fabulous-looking recipes to try. I can’t wait to make the cherry pie, myself.
Finally, our authors urge us to view growing (and foraging and hunting) and cooking
food as not just a family affair. It needs to be a community affair. Where one has coaxed plenitude from the soil, the other may be less experienced. While gun-owning neighbors may have meat to eat, those who shun weapons may not. At some point, we all need to raise a few chickens or rabbits. Goats may also be a possibility. Cows, I think, really require you to know what you’re doing. Again, one may know, another might not. Caring for each other is why we’re here.
I would highly recommend this book to any reader with even the slightest interest in knowing how to cope as the weather warms and the national, corporate, fossil-fuel dependent food system begins to collapse. While I for one do not look for total collapse
for some time yet, it is entirely possible that citizens will need to start filling in gaps in the food supply sooner rather than later. These authors are knowledgeable and compassionate. Their knowledge, experience, and wisdom (different than knowledge) are three valuable commodities. Buy this book!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...