Skip to main content

Free Dumping, Not Free Markets

July 9, 2012 - Have you detected a subtle shift recently, dating back to, oh say the beginning of the heat wave?  I'm talking about a shift in the way people think.  It's subtle because it is thus far unspoken.  If you could hear the sound of anxiety, however, I think this is the way it would sound.  The interesting part is, after surveying the titles of stories in the news today, I think the shift is already detectable in the pages of our newspapers and magazines.  Care for a sampling?

How global warming is driving our weather wild
Higher ocean acidity is climate change's "evil twin," major threat to coral reefs: NOAA chief
Havoc as monsoon displaces millions
Scientists back global action on reefs
Relief comes for US Midwest, Northeast after heat wave

Televised mainstream media isn't ready for primetime yet.  CNN's story about the last 12 months having been the warmest on record refers only to high heat and severe storms - two of the possible outcomes of global warming - but not to global warming itself.  On the other hand, the fact that the story was their lead on cnn.com for awhile may speak volumes.  I think this latest scorcher has made a real impression.

That is not to imply that news websites everywhere suffer from a lack of things to say about climate change. An op-ed piece by Dean Baker, titled "The DC Blackouts and Global Warming" appeared on Al Jazeera's website today.  It is one terrific piece, with explosive things to say in a very down-to-earth manner.  Rather than comment on it, I'm going to reproduce the last three paragraphs here.  Anyone who would like to read the whole article should go to www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/07/20127974648934151.html .

"This raises a final point, which should be obvious but somehow is largely ignored in the public debate.  Restrictions on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are intended to limit global warming have nothing to do with restricting the market.  These restrictions are about enforcing the rule of law and preventing some people from harming others with their actions.

In this way, restrictions on GHG are similar to the laws that prohibit me from dumping my sewage on my neighbor's lawn.  The opponents of these restrictions don't give a damn  about free markets.  Opponents of restrictions on GHG emissions are arguing for the right to dump sewage on their neighbors' lawn [sic].  Their argument is that the United States is a big powerful country so we can do whatever we want to the rest of the world and no one can stop us.

That may or may not prove true in the decades ahead as China surpasses the United States as an economic power and other countries gain on us.  But no one should mistake the position that we are strong enough to do whatever we want in the world, without regard to the consequences, for a principled commitment to a free market.  The global warming deniers are committed to free dumping, not free markets."

I think I'm in love.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wildfires

March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.

Monsanto and the EPA

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action: Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with  federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp. The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost- wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto  to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the  EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…