Skip to main content

Getting There was Half the Fun


July 29, 2013 – If you live in a city in the United States, chances are less likely you own a car than they used to be.  Public transportation has become an acceptable alternative for many, and a foregone conclusion for the educated young.  College graduates wait as long as possible to get their driver’s license, and they often don’t own cars.  The further outside the city you go, the less true this becomes.  As the distances increase to get to work, shop for food, and visit the doctor, car ownership becomes more of a necessity, especially where public transportation is not an alternative.
There are a number of reasons for the decline in car ownership, perhaps the most obvious being the recession.  The costs of buying, insuring, and maintaining  a car have become financially prohibitive.  One less obvious reason, at least to a baby boomer like me, is the Internet.  Younger folks find interactions on the web a satisfactory substitution for person-to-person socializing.  Shopping and entertainment can also be had on the web.  No car required.  City life makes cars unnecessary; either work and shopping are close-by, or buses are available to take you where you want to go.  Finally, younger people are keenly aware of what cars do to the environment, and they want no part of it.  Good on them!

Michael Sivak, research professor at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, says he believes the decline in vehicle use and ownership is likely to be permanent.  In a recent paper titled “Has Motorization in the U.S. Peaked?,” Sivak notes that vehicles per person, per driver, and per household all peaked in 2006, before the recession began.  Vehicle miles traveled per person have dropped for eight years in a row.  They are now about 7.5 percent below the 2004 peak.  These patterns, Sivak believes, have the makings of a long-term trend.
What about driver’s licenses?  In 2010, 69.5 percent of 19-year-olds had one.  That’s a six percent decline from 2008, and almost an 18 percent decline from 1983.  In fact, smaller declines have occurred in all other age groups, except for people over 70, and those between 25 and 29, according to the Federal Highway Administration.  How is that possible?  The increase in public transportation ridership throughout the entire nation could well have something to do with it.

Amtrak is setting records for ridership.  This year will be its 10th record-setting year during the last 11.  The overall mass transit picture looks very much the same: buses, trains, subways and trolleys carried 10.56 billion riders in 2012.  That’s the second highest total since 1957, according to the American Public Transportation Association (APTA).  APTA says that high gas prices and traffic congestion are “driving” people off the roads and onto mass transit.  There’s just one downside: public transportation is funded largely by gasoline taxes.  As a result of declining car ownership, those revenues are also declining.  For the first time ever, the Federal Highway Trust was augmented by the general fund in 2008.  The condition of road and bridges is not likely to improve, and that may mean even more people looking for “the road less traveled.”
Scooter, anybody?



With thanks to The Philadelphia Inquirer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Truly, There's Nothing to be Afraid of

February 26, 2013 – The 1960s scared conservatives worse than I knew – worse than a lot of us knew, I guess.   Certainly I lived through that period.   Certainly young adults found their voices, and had the nerve to object to being put through the meat grinder called Vietnam.   Black Americans continued to seek justice and equality in their adopted homeland.   Change was inevitable.   It’s understandable that conservatives wanted a say in what those changes would be.   Their fearful reaction was – and is - badly overblown.   Others’ happiness is nothing to fear.     These longed-for changes cost conservatives nothing but their unearned, self-satisfied atrophy.   Young people went on dying, even so. It turns out all of that change scared the socks off market fundamentalists.   Determined to return the country to its previous perceived state of inertia, Lewis Powell wrote a memorandum for the US Chamber of Commerce, urging a sh...

Greenland: A State of Rapid Collapse

 September 1, 2020 The good news, such as it is, goes like this: the suspense is over. No need to guess about whether sea level rise will be life-altering by the end of this century or not. It will, at least for the 40 percent of humankind which lives on or near a coastline. That's because all the ice on Greenland is going to melt, according to researchers at Ohio State University (yes, yes, I know - it's THE Ohio State University. Get over yourselves.) Their research appeared in the journal Nature Communications Earth and Environment in August. Total meltdown will take 10,000 years, but enough will have melted by 2100 to cause sea level rise of approximately three feet. That will cover a lot of coastal property, a loss made worse by storms and hurricanes. How have researchers reached this conclusion? By studying almost 40 years of satellite data. Glaciers on Greenland have shrunk so much since the year 2000 that even if global warming came to a complete stop, they would contin...