Skip to main content

Book Review: Enough is Enough


January 15, 2014 – BOOK REVIEW: Enough is Enough, by Rob Dietz & Dan O’Neill.

I won’t keep you in suspense: it’s a fascinating book.  Dietz & O’Neill make the subject of a steady-state economy both terribly interesting and accessible.  As it ought to be; there’s really nothing terribly complicated about it.  Take, for instance, their definition of a steady-state economy, which begins “… a steady-state economy is an economy that aims to maintain a stable level of resource consumption and a stable population. It’s an economy in which material and energy use are kept within ecological limits, and in which the goal of increasing GDP is replaced by the goal of improving quality of life.”

Because the information contained in the book isn’t hard to understand does not mean that establishing a steady-state economy will be an easy thing to do.  Oddly enough, climate change could be helpful in this regard.  Maintaining a constant stock of built capital – roads, for example –is one facet of a steady-state economy.  Our current winter weather has caused an enormous amount of road damage already.  By maintaining what we have – not adding to the inventory – we move in the direction of creating a steady state.  It’s unlikely we’ll have the money left for building new roads.  It in fact remains to be seen if we have enough money to take care of what we’ve already built.

That is an open question because we haven’t even begun to see the worst of climate change.  Taking care of buildings and roads will be a challenge we want to rise to, and we have certainly demonstrated, as a society, our willingness to go into debt in order to procure the things we believe we need.  Whether or not all roads can be covered in asphalt or concrete, or whether gravel, or even mud, will have to suffice, only time will tell.  The years ahead will help us to re-establish the difference between need and want.  Having enough of anything may once again mean a sufficiency, more than which is unnecessary and even counter-productive.

As for maintaining a stable population, it has very recently been forecast that hundreds of millions of people will be impacted by the loss of coastline that sea level rise will cause.  Add to this major factor the likelihood that people will live much more closely together, due to the loss of land.  An increased mortality rate, the result of communicable disease and wars over the land that remains, could well bring an end to the increase in human population.

Dietz & O’Neill contend that improvements in quality of life, due to changes in our knowledge, technology, products, income distribution and social institutions, are the welcome aspects of a steady-state economy.  It is entirely possible that a deeply divided world, areas of which endure the worst of climate change while other regions manage to enjoy quality of life improvements, could exist, at least for a while.  There can be little doubt that, until the worsening of climate change subsides, humankind will be unable to reap the rewards that the millennia of improvements afforded us by civilization have taught us to expect.

A steady-state economy is worth striving for.  Discovering whether we can attain its benefits while contending with a deranged environment could make for some interesting times ahead.  Because human beings always need to be able to aspire to something better, find out how to do that by reading this book.  It will tell you where your energies can make the greatest difference in improving our beloved world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...