Skip to main content

Military Preparations Underway


February 24, 2014 – While the American Congress dithers, militaries across the globe are gearing up for the threats presented by climate change.  In England, where this month a 250-year flood washed away train lines, knocked out power lines, and made 5,800 homes unlivable, the armed forces see their role as one of offering relief at home.  Rear Admiral Neil Morisetti, formerly of the Royal Navy, says that military planners are examining how the various branches can be put to their best use elsewhere in the event of future floods, droughts and other natural disasters.  The UK’s long supply chains, which are used to import 40% of its food and over 50% of its fuel, rely on shipping “choke points” which must not be closed off.

At NATO Headquarters, Hartmund Behrend, a climate risks expert in Germany’s army, says that “ … health risks, climate change, water security and increasing energy needs will further shape the future security environment in areas of concern to NATO, and have the potential to significantly affect NATO planning and operations.”  A crisis management center is in the planning stages at Supreme Headquarters, Allied Power Europe.  Its task will be identifying longer term risks.  Behrend believes that climate change and land degradation are two of NATO’s most important long-term challenges.

In Australia, Lieutenant-General David Morrison says that, because of the low-lying islands located nearby Australia, he envisions the military’s primary role, as climate change unfolds, being one of providing immediate assistance for humanitarian and disaster relief.  Morrison believes that the development of an amphibious force will be most useful in carrying out this responsibility.  Surprisingly, Australia's running battle with drought and wildfires was not mentioned.

Here in the United States, the Pentagon has recognized the urgency of preparing for climate change for a number of years.  As a result, the Army is working toward net-zero energy use at several bases, and the Navy and Air Force intend to use biofuels in operating jets.  In Afghanistan, Army patrols carry solar blankets and LED lamps.  Current and retired military leaders view these efforts as essential to better enabling soldiers to execute their mission.  The use of renewable and energy-efficient technologies, such as solar blankets that are used to recharge batteries, allows soldiers and contractors to decrease the number of resupply missions.  Solar modules have limited the need for diesel fuel, thereby reducing the number of convoy trips necessary for its delivery, and the likelihood of ambushes and roadside bombs.

A 2010 Defense Department review highlighted climate change and energy security as military vulnerabilities, stating that climate change in particular is an “accelerant of instability and conflict.”  Solomon Hsiang, a post-doctoral researcher at Princeton University, agrees with that assessment.  His research has linked major climate events such as El Nino with a rise in civil conflict.  Hsiang has established that social unrest is six percent more likely to devolve into active violence during El Nino periods.  He believes that this periodic disturbance has played a role in one out of five civil conflicts since 1950.  Because of Hsiang’s groundbreaking research, our military can be one step ahead during tinderbox situations.  With or without congressional help.



With thanks to scientificamerican.com, radioaustralia.net.au, and rtcc.org.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...