Skip to main content

Can We Recreate the Amazon If It Burns?

August 23, 2019

The Amazon is an enormous rainforest in South America. It covers forty percent of the South American continent, and can be found in eight countries. If it were laid over a map of the 48 contiguous states of the United States, it would encompass nearly two-thirds of it. Because trees breathe in carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, it is essential that we protect them, wherever they grow. In Brazil, where much of the Amazon is located, the president of that country has been encouraging farmers, ranchers, and loggers to exploit the riches that can be found there. That means clearing away the trees by incinerating them.

So hellbent are farmers on enlarging their holdings and growing more food, they organized a "fire day" last week. In order to accommodate them, President Bolsonaro of Brazil has weakened regulations intended to protect forests and indigenous lands. His failure to halt deforestation, in keeping with the Paris Climate Accords, has caused Germany and Norway to withhold tens of millions of dollars in aid. Environmental agencies in that country have lost $23 million from their budgets, a lot of money in Brazil. Is it any surprise that deforestation has increased by 80 percent since last year? Thus far, an incredible 74,155 fires have burned in the Amazon this year. This equates to 1,330 square miles of rainforest. Brazil's National Institute for Space Research (INPE) started recording data regarding forest fires in 2013. They report that 870 square miles of forest disappeared during July of this year alone!

Around 30 million people live in the Amazon, of whom roughly 1 million are indigenous. It goes without saying, their livelihoods and even lives are threatened. Representatives of these indigenous peoples report that the fires are consuming crops and animals, while decimating river systems upon which residents rely. The fires release toxic gases as they burn, among them carbon monoxide, sending inhabitants of the forest to the hospital for help with respiratory issues. The Amazon provides the world's citizens with 20 percent of the oxygen we need in order to survive. "The Amazon is incredibly important for our future, for our ability to stave off the worst of climate change," said Christian Poirier, program director of the environmental organization Amazon Watch. "This isn't hyperbole. We're looking at untold destruction - not just of the Amazon but for our entire planet."



With thanks to Slate.com and CNN.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Greenland: A State of Rapid Collapse

 September 1, 2020 The good news, such as it is, goes like this: the suspense is over. No need to guess about whether sea level rise will be life-altering by the end of this century or not. It will, at least for the 40 percent of humankind which lives on or near a coastline. That's because all the ice on Greenland is going to melt, according to researchers at Ohio State University (yes, yes, I know - it's THE Ohio State University. Get over yourselves.) Their research appeared in the journal Nature Communications Earth and Environment in August. Total meltdown will take 10,000 years, but enough will have melted by 2100 to cause sea level rise of approximately three feet. That will cover a lot of coastal property, a loss made worse by storms and hurricanes. How have researchers reached this conclusion? By studying almost 40 years of satellite data. Glaciers on Greenland have shrunk so much since the year 2000 that even if global warming came to a complete stop, they would contin...

The Environmental Polluting Agency

April 17, 2020 Under cover of an historic pandemic, the EPA has announced it will suspend enforcement of environmental laws. You read that right. The agency is hoping we're all so distracted that no one will notice. Why would they do this, you ask. It will come as no surprise that a number of industries, including oil, have asked for the suspension. In the words of EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler: EPA "recognizes challenges resulting from efforts to protect workers and the public from COVID 19 may directly impact the ability of regulated facilities to meet all federal regulatory requirements." Critics of the hiatus concede exceptions to regulations could be made on a case-by-case basis, for example, if companies are short-staffed because employees are working from home. But those industries deemed essential and continuing to operate should be expected to comply with the law. In fact, because COVID 19 is exacerbated by air pollution, leading to higher death rates, pol...