Skip to main content

Can We Recreate the Amazon If It Burns?

August 23, 2019

The Amazon is an enormous rainforest in South America. It covers forty percent of the South American continent, and can be found in eight countries. If it were laid over a map of the 48 contiguous states of the United States, it would encompass nearly two-thirds of it. Because trees breathe in carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, it is essential that we protect them, wherever they grow. In Brazil, where much of the Amazon is located, the president of that country has been encouraging farmers, ranchers, and loggers to exploit the riches that can be found there. That means clearing away the trees by incinerating them.

So hellbent are farmers on enlarging their holdings and growing more food, they organized a "fire day" last week. In order to accommodate them, President Bolsonaro of Brazil has weakened regulations intended to protect forests and indigenous lands. His failure to halt deforestation, in keeping with the Paris Climate Accords, has caused Germany and Norway to withhold tens of millions of dollars in aid. Environmental agencies in that country have lost $23 million from their budgets, a lot of money in Brazil. Is it any surprise that deforestation has increased by 80 percent since last year? Thus far, an incredible 74,155 fires have burned in the Amazon this year. This equates to 1,330 square miles of rainforest. Brazil's National Institute for Space Research (INPE) started recording data regarding forest fires in 2013. They report that 870 square miles of forest disappeared during July of this year alone!

Around 30 million people live in the Amazon, of whom roughly 1 million are indigenous. It goes without saying, their livelihoods and even lives are threatened. Representatives of these indigenous peoples report that the fires are consuming crops and animals, while decimating river systems upon which residents rely. The fires release toxic gases as they burn, among them carbon monoxide, sending inhabitants of the forest to the hospital for help with respiratory issues. The Amazon provides the world's citizens with 20 percent of the oxygen we need in order to survive. "The Amazon is incredibly important for our future, for our ability to stave off the worst of climate change," said Christian Poirier, program director of the environmental organization Amazon Watch. "This isn't hyperbole. We're looking at untold destruction - not just of the Amazon but for our entire planet."



With thanks to Slate.com and CNN.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Truly, There's Nothing to be Afraid of

February 26, 2013 – The 1960s scared conservatives worse than I knew – worse than a lot of us knew, I guess.   Certainly I lived through that period.   Certainly young adults found their voices, and had the nerve to object to being put through the meat grinder called Vietnam.   Black Americans continued to seek justice and equality in their adopted homeland.   Change was inevitable.   It’s understandable that conservatives wanted a say in what those changes would be.   Their fearful reaction was – and is - badly overblown.   Others’ happiness is nothing to fear.     These longed-for changes cost conservatives nothing but their unearned, self-satisfied atrophy.   Young people went on dying, even so. It turns out all of that change scared the socks off market fundamentalists.   Determined to return the country to its previous perceived state of inertia, Lewis Powell wrote a memorandum for the US Chamber of Commerce, urging a sh...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...