August 16, 2019
The Trump Administration is proposing a freeze on federal fuel economy standards at 2020 levels. The state of California has reached an agreement with four automakers that would call for average fuel economy of 51 miles per gallon by 2026. Automakers are siding with California, because they don't want to have to build two different cars to meet two different standards. In fact, 17 car companies informed Trump by letter in June that the weakening of fuel economy standards could destabilize the entire auto-making industry.
The good news? More and more states support California's higher standards. States like New Jersey, Connecticut, Washington, Vermont, New York, Maine, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Delaware. The District of Columbia also backs California's clean air standards, and Colorado, an oil-producing state, has just joined this farsighted group. They are what is considered a "Section 177 state," in reference to the section of the Clean Air Act that allows California's stricter measures. New Mexico, another oil-producing state, plans to rejoin California's supporters after leaving while under the guidance of Republican Governor Susana Martinez. (Arizona and Florida did the same thing.)
Eight senior House Democrats and thirty Senate Democrats called on 14 other automakers to join Ford, BMW, Honda and Volkswagen in agreeing to adhere to California's standards. The letter from Senate Democrats reads, in part, "In the absence of an agreement between the Federal government and states, the California agreement is a commonsense framework that provides flexibility to the industry to meet tailpipe standards while also taking important steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and save money on fuel for consumers."
Environmental and public health experts say the effects of lower standards would be swiftly realized. Research released last week by the group Energy Innovation found that lower standards could cost the U.S. $400 billion through 2050. Worse still, U.S. transport emissions would increase by as much as 10% by 2035. States are aware of these forecasts and can, environmental groups predict, be expected to adopt California's more exacting measures.
With thanks to ThinkProgress.
The Trump Administration is proposing a freeze on federal fuel economy standards at 2020 levels. The state of California has reached an agreement with four automakers that would call for average fuel economy of 51 miles per gallon by 2026. Automakers are siding with California, because they don't want to have to build two different cars to meet two different standards. In fact, 17 car companies informed Trump by letter in June that the weakening of fuel economy standards could destabilize the entire auto-making industry.
The good news? More and more states support California's higher standards. States like New Jersey, Connecticut, Washington, Vermont, New York, Maine, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Delaware. The District of Columbia also backs California's clean air standards, and Colorado, an oil-producing state, has just joined this farsighted group. They are what is considered a "Section 177 state," in reference to the section of the Clean Air Act that allows California's stricter measures. New Mexico, another oil-producing state, plans to rejoin California's supporters after leaving while under the guidance of Republican Governor Susana Martinez. (Arizona and Florida did the same thing.)
Eight senior House Democrats and thirty Senate Democrats called on 14 other automakers to join Ford, BMW, Honda and Volkswagen in agreeing to adhere to California's standards. The letter from Senate Democrats reads, in part, "In the absence of an agreement between the Federal government and states, the California agreement is a commonsense framework that provides flexibility to the industry to meet tailpipe standards while also taking important steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and save money on fuel for consumers."
Environmental and public health experts say the effects of lower standards would be swiftly realized. Research released last week by the group Energy Innovation found that lower standards could cost the U.S. $400 billion through 2050. Worse still, U.S. transport emissions would increase by as much as 10% by 2035. States are aware of these forecasts and can, environmental groups predict, be expected to adopt California's more exacting measures.
With thanks to ThinkProgress.
Comments
Post a Comment