Skip to main content

Clean Air Saves Money

February 11, 2013 - It's time to put it in writing: I've had a lifelong love affair with the Scandinavians. Oh, don't be shocked - they don't even know about it. They're completely innocent. What else, though, can a person do? First there are the Danes, the happiest people in the world. They don't go around bragging about it, the way we would. They're too busy having a great time! Next come the Swedes, perfectly content with their amazing social welfare system and its cradle-to-grave healthcare and education benefits, all paid for by their government. Not that I intend to write about either of these nations, however spectacularly pragmatic they may be. No, my heart skips a beat these days because of those rock-solid, straight-ahead Norwegians. Ogle, ogle, sigh, sigh.

What did they do when the little South American country of Guyana came knocking on their door, asking them to foot the bill if Guyana agreed to halt deforestation? After thinking about it carefully, and realizing that what happens to one happens to all, Norway agreed to do it. You see, Guyana experienced the worst flooding in its history in 2006. With over half of his country lying below sea level, Guyana's president, Bharrat Jagdeo, had what you might call an epiphany. The connection between deforestation and climate change (the fact that one helps to cause the other) suddenly became crystal clear to him. Put simply, trees clean the air. Dirty air causes climate change. Sea level rise is caused by climate change, so Jagdeo decided to leave his country's forests - 80% of which were still intact - just the way they were, for a price. It made sense.

In 2008, Guyana went looking for a sponsor. By 2009, Norway and Guyana had the details ironed out. Norway would pay Guyana up to $250 million through the year 2015 if it would halt its greenhouse gas emissions caused by deforestation. So far, Norway has made good on $115 million of its pledge. With the money, Guyana is installing fiber optic cable, in order to further IT employment, and it's building hydroelectric projects, as well. Electricity produced by the movement of water is expected to save businesses and residents $3.5 billion over a period of 20 years. President Jagdeo may not have known much about planning for climate change seven years ago, but I'd say he's pretty well got it nailed by now. Good thinking, Guyana. Well done, Norway.

In my own country, the beleaguered population of New England is making a solid contribution toward reducing global warming gases. Chances are, there aren't many people who reside in the Northeast who need further convincing about the toll climate change is exacting, and will exact, from everyone - no matter where they live. Nine states in all, comprising much of New England and the Mid-Atlantic, have agreed to further limitations on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants that burn fossil fuels.

The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), to which these nine states belong, will lower the cap on CO2 emissions from 165 million tons to 91 million tons in 2014. This will constitute a 45 percent reduction from 2005 levels. During the period from 2015 - 2020, the cap will be lowered an additional 2.5 percent a year. The word "cap" is used because these limits are part of a cap-and-trade program. Power plants that generate more than 25 megawatts must purchase an allowance for each ton beyond that amount. The allowances can be bought and sold amongst participating power plants.

Each member of RGGI must ratify the proposed limitations. Because emissions have declined since 2005, in part because of the switch from coal to natural gas, the new limits should be relatively easy to achieve. Member states are Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont. The money to be saved in healthcare costs alone should be impressive. The money that will be saved by all of us due to mitigated warming and the lower repair costs resulting from weaker storms could run to millions and millions.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie withdrew New Jersey from the program in 2011, saying the agreement was a burden to taxpayers. (Remember that come 2016, voters!)



Popular posts from this blog

Monsanto and the EPA

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action: Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with  federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp. The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost- wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto  to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the  EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…


March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.