Skip to main content

It's All Come Down to This


February 4, 2013 - It's great to be back. There's a lot going on: lots of good science finally coming to fruition ,a president who knows what needs to be done who, now that he's been re-elected; will finally do what needs to be done; most of the continent of Australia either on fire or flooding; much of eastern China - including Beijing - more and more frequently swathed in enough pollution to shorten lives significantly. A mixed bag, that's for sure.

It does seem as though there's a distinct possibility the United States may finally begin taking its environmental responsibilities seriously. Too little, too late? Only time will tell. But the nice people at Bloomberg New Energy Finance tell us that CO2 emissions have fallen by 13% in the past five years here in the U.S., putting them at their lowest levels since 1994. This has been accomplished through the application of energy-saving technologies, and a doubling in the use of renewable energy. According to Lisa Jacobson, of the Business Council for Sustainable Energy, none of this has caused economic slowing. In fact, emissions declined even as GDP increased, putting the lie to conservative arguments to the contrary.

Meanwhile, coal has fallen to 18.1% of America's total energy output, down from 22.5% in 2007. Oil burning has also declined. Natural gas, because of fracking, has increased to 31% of total energy output. This fact, viewed optimistically by some, quite negatively by others, is unlikely to hold sway for all that long. Fracked wells play out very quickly, producing a need for more and more fracking. Because methane is released both at the point of origin and during burning at the power plant, the advantage of natural gas with regard to greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE) may be small, indeed.

The expansion of wind, solar, hydro and geothermal sources of energy makes them the fastest growing of any source in the United States. Even better, total energy consumption has fallen by 6.4% since 2007 in the U.S. Most of this is due to more efficient heating and cooling systems in commercial buildings. Not to be overlooked, half a million hybrid and plug-in vehicles were purchased in the U.S. last year. Finally: the signs, it would seem, are all pointing in the right direction.

The timing couldn't be better, particularly in light of the findings at the University of Reading's (U.K.) Walker Institute.

Their research indicates that rigorously limiting GHGE could save tens of millions of people from suffering and an early demise. If emissions were to peak no later than 2016,and decline at 5% a year after that, much of the expected drought and flooding could be curtailed, resulting in 20 - 65% of climate change's damaging effects being avoided between now and the year 2100. Indeed, the Institute's studies reveal that 200 million people - or more - would benefit by addressing GHGE with great urgency.

Of the impacts of climate change studied, stable crop productivity, a reduction in flooding, and sufficient energy for cooling are the likeliest benefits of a dramatic reduction in emissions. We at last know the quantifiable results of limiting the global temperature increase to 2 degrees centigrade. The vital importance of adhering to and continuing with UN climate negotiations, and the immediate beneficial effects of doing so, have never been clearer. That means the choice has never been clearer, the need for action never more immediate. Now we know.

With thanks to Climate Progress, theaustralian.com, and The Guardian (UK).

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wildfires

March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.

Monsanto and the EPA

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action: Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with  federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp. The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost- wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto  to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the  EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…