February 26, 2013 – The 1960s scared conservatives worse
than I knew – worse than a lot of us knew, I guess. Certainly I lived through that period. Certainly young adults found their voices,
and had the nerve to object to being put through the meat grinder called
Vietnam. Black Americans continued to
seek justice and equality in their adopted homeland. Change was inevitable. It’s understandable that conservatives wanted
a say in what those changes would be.
Their fearful reaction was – and is - badly overblown. Others’ happiness is nothing to fear. These
longed-for changes cost conservatives nothing but their unearned,
self-satisfied atrophy. Young people
went on dying, even so.
It turns out all of that change scared the socks off market
fundamentalists. Determined to return
the country to its previous perceived state of inertia, Lewis Powell wrote a
memorandum for the US Chamber of Commerce, urging a shift in power away from
progressivism. Powell, a corporate
lawyer for the tobacco industry, was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1971,
just two months after writing this landmark document. Once on the federal bench, Powell acted in
concert with other conservative jurists to re-interpret American law in favor
of corporations. (As a result,
corporate lobbying became a major industry in its own right. Valued at $100 million in 1975, it now
budgets $3.5 billion per year for its oft-times fraudulent activities.)
Pro-corporate politicians enjoyed increasing prominence,
commensurate with the new-found campaign funds their corporate masters lavished
on them. Their rise in power has
continued, unabated. Now, a study by the
National Institute of Medicine reveals that the Tea Party Movement
(conservative politics and politicians’ most recent manifestation) was, in
fact, orchestrated over a decade ago by groups with ties to the tobacco and
fossil fuel industries. There was, in
other words, nothing spontaneous about its origination. The Tea Party is part of a long-term,
conservative strategy to promote anti-science,
anti-government thinking. In league
with the Tea Party’s vehement science skepticism is ALEC, or the American
Legislative Exchange Council. ALEC and
its members busy themselves with producing “model bills” which are then
introduced into the legislatures of conservative states.
For instance, Texas, Louisiana, Tennessee and Oklahoma have
passed bills requiring that teachers question the scientific basis of global
warming. Kansas will soon join this select,
albeit antediluvian, group of states.
National Center for Science Education executive director Eugenie Scott
says that “the only effects of enacting such a misguided bill would be to
discourage responsible teachers from presenting climate science accurately, and
to encourage irresponsible teachers to misrepresent it as controversial.” Because climate science is exactly that – a science
- and because 97% of American climatologists uphold research findings in global
warming/climate change, teachers’ time would be much better spent teaching our
children how best to prepare for the extraordinary changes they will
experience.
Fear is reactive, unproductive, and unthinking. It relies on the prehistoric, “fight or
flight” part of our brains. Its motto is
“You can’t make me.” Its essence is at
the core of our Congress’ current conduct.
The “other,” whatever or whomever it may be, is to be ignored, then derided,
then vanquished. At least, that’s what
Republicans convince themselves will happen time, after time, after time. Better they would remember Schopenhauer’s
admonition: “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” Some people never learn.
With thanks to
algore.com and thinkprogress.org.
Thought you might enjoy this: "For instance, a while back I saw a video clip of an ethanol-fueled automobile driving past waves of grain with the Rockies in the background and a rippling American flag ghosted into the sky. These four elements of the clip, food grain fields, the automotive industry, the natural beauty of the Rockies and the national emblem have not much to do with each in the natural world, but they have everything to do with one another in the context of corporate empire. Together, they indicate the national ethos. We accept such an image as naturally as the baby accepts the tit, and the idea of burning the earth's food to create gasses that will turn the snowcapped mountains into desertified mountains is greeted happily as something newer and better than the old system of destroying the atmosphere and environment. Mentally we can identify separate elements, isolate things into categories. But the hologram nevertheless remains seamless in its interconnection of all things that benefit the corporate state generating it. Parsed, divided and isolated, any part contains the entire logic (or governing illogic) of the whole -- consuming."
ReplyDeletehttp://www.joebageant.com/joe/2007/08/the-great-ameri.html
Hi NCF -
DeleteWe sure do make problems for ourselves, don't we? In the end, I believe it will all come right; it's that interim part I'm a little fuzzy about. Sure would be great if humankind could acquire some long-lasting takeaways from all this!
Best, Vicki