Skip to main content

A Policy of Triage


March 28, 2013 - It seems odd that this could have happened with so little fanfare, but the Obama Administration announced its first national strategy for dealing with climate change on Tuesday.  This strategy, released in the form of a report, was the product of any number of government agencies, with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation taking the lead.  Developed with the help of over 90 federal, state, tribal and local officials, the strategy recommends seven goals, among them land conservation, species maintenance, and educating the public.

Land conservation and habitat loss mitigation are going to play a huge role in implementing climate change strategy, because habitats traditionally occupied by certain species have already been altered by global warming.  In the case of the Lesser Prairie Chicken, the threats come from all sides: climate change, mining, oil production and loss of habitat.  Because the government already pays farmers and ranchers to remove land from production in order to create wildlife refuges, it will be possible to return some of it to native prairie, thereby offsetting Lesser Prairie Chicken habitat loss.

Other species urgently in need of assistance include brook trout, coral reefs, and salmon.  One member of the plant kingdom on this list is the Joshua Tree, for which Joshua Tree National Park (JTNP) is named.  Unless matters improve, the Joshua Tree will have disappeared from its habitat in southern California almost entirely by the year 2100.  This took me a bit by surprise because I just visited JTNP and saw the ugly Joshua Tree for the first time.  While not what you would describe as a visual treat, in a landscape which consists of rocks and little else, the hardy Joshua Tree affords the eye some relief from the weathered tan that surrounds onlookers.  It has earned its ecological niche, but that does not guarantee its survival.

Deciding which species to help will be a very pragmatic process involving difficult decisions.   According to Dan Ashe, Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, hunting, fishing and other wildlife-related activities contribute $120 billion to the economy every year.  In addition, the seafood industry has a value of $116 billion.  Those species that contribute only their beauty or their rarity to humankind, without impacting the public coffers, may not get much in the way of help.  There apparently is just not enough to go around, and too many creatures in distress.

Nevertheless, over the next five years, the priorities established in the report will begin to be addressed.  One of these consists of establishing wildlife “corridors” that would enable animals and plants to move to new habitat.  It will not always be necessary for the government to buy land in order to accomplish this goal.  Many times, easements and land trusts can be set aside by working with state and local authorities.  Because of an easement that exists on private land in Florida, one of the last remaining corridors for panthers is protected.  Where large tracts of land are involved, the federal government can sometimes step in.  The current administration has added ten new wildlife habitats, totaling 4.5 million acres, thus far.

Taken all in all, Tuesday’s announcement was good, if not necessarily happy, news.

 

 
With thanks to USAToday and the Los Angeles Times.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wildfires

March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.

Monsanto and the EPA

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action: Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with  federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp. The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost- wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto  to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the  EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…