Skip to main content

Knowledge is Power


March 11, 2013 – I was awfully glad to hear that Whole Foods intends to require labeling of all the foods, fresh or processed, sold in their stores that contain GMO’s (genetically modified organisms).  Their patience in allowing vendors five years to get labeling underway is nonsensical; this must be the spoonful of sugar that helps the medicine go down.  The importance of their new policy can’t be overstated, though: consumers will gradually come to accept the provision of this information as normal.  In so doing, some will take the additional step of finding out why eating GMO’s could be problematic.    Some will find out that the research to which the FDA repeatedly refers, when it claims foods containing GMO’s present no threat to human health, was performed by the companies that developed and sell the GMO seed!  The education of the masses is, at last, off to a late, hesitant start.
Organic foods will not require GMO labeling since they may not, by definition, contain them.  According to the National Academies of Sciences, four-fifths of the corn and soybeans grown in this country are grown from GE (genetically engineered = genetically modified) seed.  The same is true of cotton, the most pesticide-intensive crop grown anywhere in the world.  Monsanto, Syngenta, et. al., claim that mandatory labeling will only confuse customers.   Makers of GE seed have gone to great lengths to defeat mandatory labeling laws wherever they have been proposed.  Thus far this year, the following states ‘ General Assemblies are considering bills that either require labeling, or prohibit the sale of genetically engineered foods:  Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Indiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Tennessee, Vermont, and Washington.

The self-serving efforts of GMO makers notwithstanding, the growing demand for non-GMO (NGMO) products has been made evident in two separate ways – first, by consumers who have voiced their desire for increased access to such products, and second, by the 15 – 30% growth in sales of these products.  NGMO products are identified by a “Non-GMO” verification label.  According to A.C. Gallo, president of Whole Foods, NGMO products are actually more expensive to produce than products containing GMO’s, due to the short supply of ingredients.  As market demand for NGMO products continues upward, prices should come down.  Mellman Research has shown that 92 percent of American consumers want to know whether or not the food they consume contains GMO’s.
If you’re like me, you’ll want to know - How can I help move events in the direction of getting all food products with GMO’s labeled?  I think one way to let the big food companies know about your interest is to call them.  Ask them which of their products contain GMO’s, then tell them you want their products labeled to that effect.  Here are some phone numbers to help you get started:

General Mills                      1-800-248-7310
Kelloggs                               1-800-962-1413

Kraft Foods                         1-877-535-5666
Nabisco                               1-855-535-5648

Pepsico                                1-800-352-4477

Have I missed a particular “favorite” of yours?  Look them up online, then give them a call.  Let’s give Whole Foods a hand.

 
With thanks to the Washington Post and the Huffington Post.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wildfires

March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.

Monsanto and the EPA

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action: Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with  federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp. The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost- wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto  to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the  EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…