Skip to main content

Education Can Change Our World

March 18, 2013 – This is interesting:  as many as 41 of the 50 states will soon be teaching science that includes climate change.  Up until now, the approach to teaching climate change in our public schools could have been described as “helter-skelter.” A rigorous approach to the subject was frequently impossible, because the personal beliefs of teachers, administrators, and/or parents got in the way.  Coupled with the fact that the last set of science education standards did not include teacher input, science teaching and teachers were in a bad place.  No more!
Next Generation Science Standards were developed by the National Research Council, the National Science Teachers Association, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the nonprofit Achieve, and more than two dozen states.   The 26 states that worked to develop the standards include 7 of the ten most populous.  These 26 committed time, personnel, and financial resources to the project.  Other state education departments wanted to participate, but didn’t have the resources.  Those states that did participate will use them, along with another 15 that have indicated their interest.

Education publishers Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and McGraw-Hill are already on the bandwagon, studying ways to incorporate the new standards into their textbooks.  Changes will appear as early as the upcoming school year (2013-2014).  Texas, one of the states that chose not to participate, writes its own curriculum.  In the past, this alone might have served to waylay the federal standards.  However, the rise in the use of e-textbooks has reduced the influence of large states.  Most importantly, the part that states themselves  played in designing the new standards means they have built-in support.  Now it is the standards which wield enormous influence.
The next question is obvious: what do the standards say?  Generally speaking, they require teaching that climate change is broadly accepted science.  The science tells us that carbon dioxide emissions from burning oil, coal and gas are warming our planet.  The subject is introduced in elementary school, and should be taught in an interdisciplinary fashion.  By high school, teachers will be encouraged to frame climate change as a problem to which humans need to adapt, mitigate, and solve.  Lessons or experiments could focus on preparing communities for coastal flooding, or on inventing a carbon capture technique.

Mark McCaffrey, programs and policy director of the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), believes there will be major benefits in applying widely-accepted standards.  When more students are taught the same information, closing state-by-state gaps in science education will be easier.  Nationwide standardization might help American students improve in global science rankings, as well.  Wouldn’t it be great if the United States didn’t have to play catch-up anymore?  Leadership in this area of climate change could well culminate in the youngsters of today dealing effectively with the world’s most pressing problem, before it’s too late.


Popular posts from this blog

The SunShot Initiative

In 2007, the amount of solar power installed in the U.S. was 1.1 gigawatts (GW). As of 2017, that amount has increased to 47.1 GW. Enough to power 9.1 million average American homes. If you're thinking "we've still got a long way to go," you'd be right. On the other hand, increasing installed power by 4300% deserves some attention.  How'd we do it?

The Department of Energy played an important role. In 2011, they initiated a program called The SunShot Initiative. They set targets for the years 2020 and 2030, by which times generating solar power would have become more affordable. More affordable on a utility scale, more affordable on a commercial scale, and more affordable on a residential scale. Thus far, they've succeeded in hitting the 2020 goal for utility-scale generation. Needless to mention, they reached that goal three years early. The goals, it should be mentioned, don't take subsidies into account. It's the technology, in the case of util…

The Future Has Arrived

September 4, 2017 - Wildfires are burning throughout the Pacific Northwest. Hurricane Harvey has decimated the greater Houston area and parts of Louisiana. Hurricane Irma glowers out in the Atlantic. In other words, forecasts made decades ago are proving accurate. Four hundred parts per million of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was regarded as a tipping point, the point at which climate change would take on a life of its own. If no one ever drove their car another block, if farmers never used another ounce of chemical fertilizer, if not so much as one more acre of land was cleared with fire, climate change would continue on its way, wreaking havoc.

We passed four hundred ppm this year. I'm not sure where we stand right now; we were supposed to be at around 410 by spring. I'm not advocating giving up. Of course not. We must still - and at this point, will, whether we want to or not - consciously lower our standard of living, and stop enjoying the conveniences for which we are…