Skip to main content

Education Can Change Our World


March 18, 2013 – This is interesting:  as many as 41 of the 50 states will soon be teaching science that includes climate change.  Up until now, the approach to teaching climate change in our public schools could have been described as “helter-skelter.” A rigorous approach to the subject was frequently impossible, because the personal beliefs of teachers, administrators, and/or parents got in the way.  Coupled with the fact that the last set of science education standards did not include teacher input, science teaching and teachers were in a bad place.  No more!
Next Generation Science Standards were developed by the National Research Council, the National Science Teachers Association, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the nonprofit Achieve, and more than two dozen states.   The 26 states that worked to develop the standards include 7 of the ten most populous.  These 26 committed time, personnel, and financial resources to the project.  Other state education departments wanted to participate, but didn’t have the resources.  Those states that did participate will use them, along with another 15 that have indicated their interest.

Education publishers Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and McGraw-Hill are already on the bandwagon, studying ways to incorporate the new standards into their textbooks.  Changes will appear as early as the upcoming school year (2013-2014).  Texas, one of the states that chose not to participate, writes its own curriculum.  In the past, this alone might have served to waylay the federal standards.  However, the rise in the use of e-textbooks has reduced the influence of large states.  Most importantly, the part that states themselves  played in designing the new standards means they have built-in support.  Now it is the standards which wield enormous influence.
The next question is obvious: what do the standards say?  Generally speaking, they require teaching that climate change is broadly accepted science.  The science tells us that carbon dioxide emissions from burning oil, coal and gas are warming our planet.  The subject is introduced in elementary school, and should be taught in an interdisciplinary fashion.  By high school, teachers will be encouraged to frame climate change as a problem to which humans need to adapt, mitigate, and solve.  Lessons or experiments could focus on preparing communities for coastal flooding, or on inventing a carbon capture technique.

Mark McCaffrey, programs and policy director of the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), believes there will be major benefits in applying widely-accepted standards.  When more students are taught the same information, closing state-by-state gaps in science education will be easier.  Nationwide standardization might help American students improve in global science rankings, as well.  Wouldn’t it be great if the United States didn’t have to play catch-up anymore?  Leadership in this area of climate change could well culminate in the youngsters of today dealing effectively with the world’s most pressing problem, before it’s too late.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wildfires

March 20, 2017 - Happy Spring, everybody. Today's post will be brief: the ten-year average for number of wildfires during January through mid-March is 8,687 fires that burned 216,894 acres per year in the United States. This year there have been 10,829 fires during that period, burning 2,062,012 acres. You read that right.

Monsanto and the EPA

April 2, 2017 - The following was sent to me by Credo by email today. Please read and take action: Stunning new documents unsealed by a federal judge suggest that Monsanto worked directly with  federal regulators to hide the health risks of and manipulate the science behind its best-selling herbicide, RoundUp. The documents reveal that Monsanto pressured Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials to not publicly release information on the cancer risks of glyphosate, the main ingredient in RoundUp, ghost- wrote research for the EPA and worked with a senior official at the agency to quash a federal review of the chemical. These documents suggest an unprecedented level of collusion between the EPA and Monsanto  to cover up evidence that RoundUp is a likely carcinogen. The Office of Inspector General of the  EPA, an independent office tasked with investigating fraud and abuse in the agency, must immediately launch an investigation to hold Monsanto and all EPA employees involved accounta…