August 22, 2013 – During the past two years, Henry Waxman
(D-CA), Energy and Commerce Committee ranking member, and Bobby Rush (D-IL), Energy and Power
Subcommittee ranking member, have sent 21 letters requesting a hearing on
climate change and the latest science bearing on the issue. Recipients Fred Upton (R-MI) and Ed Whitfield
(R-KY), House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman and Energy and Power
Subcommittee Chairman, respectively, have steadfastly ignored these
requests. The one exception occurred in
March of this year, at which time Waxman and Rush received a response.
Upton and Whitfield have now scheduled what is being called
a “major hearing” on climate change for September 18. The leaders of 13 federal agencies have been
invited to testify, among them Gina McCarthy of the EPA, Ernest Moniz of the
Dept. of Energy, Chuck Hagel of the Defense Dept., and State Dept. Secretary
John Kerry. Each letter of invitation
asks nine questions about the amount of time, money and resources devoted by
these agencies to climate change policies, and asks that written answers be
submitted at the time of the hearing.
Advance press states that the hearing, “The Obama
Administration’s Climate Change Policies and Activities,” will touch on the
scientific underpinnings of climate change.
The words “touch on” do not exactly fill me with optimism; on the other
hand, acknowledged or not, the science is not about to go away. Indeed, the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) has written another report about the science of climate
change, a draft of which has been leaked.
In it, scientist members of the panel assert that there is now 95
percent certainty about the human origins of climate change, largely by means
of burning fossil fuels. The IPCC’s
reports serve as the primary guides for U.N. member nations when they formulate
climate change policies.
At the same time, Vice President Al Gore is quoted as saying
that a number of Republican members of Congress have told him they are tired of
climate change denial by members of their own party. The reason for their change in attitude, he
believes, is the extreme weather events being reported on a daily basis in the
nightly news. Gore also alludes to the
addition of another number to the hurricane classification scale, something of
which I was unaware. There is now a
category 6, something which would give any thinking person reason to reconsider.
What the September hearings will accomplish remains to be
seen. A restive populace, as evidenced
by growing numbers of protests from one coast to the other, accompanied by
aggressive climate change campaigning on the part of Congressional Democrats,
seems to be moving Republicans off of square one. Whether or not square two can be even vaguely
perceived from where legislators stand today may be much clearer, especially to
Republicans, by the middle of next month.
With thanks to nationaljournal.com and thehill.com.
Comments
Post a Comment