Skip to main content

Congressional Hearing: Whadja Say?


August 22, 2013 – During the past two years, Henry Waxman (D-CA), Energy and Commerce Committee ranking member, and  Bobby Rush (D-IL), Energy and Power Subcommittee ranking member, have sent 21 letters requesting a hearing on climate change and the latest science bearing on the issue.  Recipients Fred Upton (R-MI) and Ed Whitfield (R-KY), House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman and Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman, respectively, have steadfastly ignored these requests.  The one exception occurred in March of this year, at which time Waxman and Rush received a response.

Upton and Whitfield have now scheduled what is being called a “major hearing” on climate change for September 18.  The leaders of 13 federal agencies have been invited to testify, among them Gina McCarthy of the EPA, Ernest Moniz of the Dept. of Energy, Chuck Hagel of the Defense Dept., and State Dept. Secretary John Kerry.   Each letter of invitation asks nine questions about the amount of time, money and resources devoted by these agencies to climate change policies, and asks that written answers be submitted at the time of the hearing.

Advance press states that the hearing, “The Obama Administration’s Climate Change Policies and Activities,” will touch on the scientific underpinnings of climate change.  The words “touch on” do not exactly fill me with optimism; on the other hand, acknowledged or not, the science is not about to go away.  Indeed, the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has written another report about the science of climate change, a draft of which has been leaked.  In it, scientist members of the panel assert that there is now 95 percent certainty about the human origins of climate change, largely by means of burning fossil fuels.  The IPCC’s reports serve as the primary guides for U.N. member nations when they formulate climate change policies.

At the same time, Vice President Al Gore is quoted as saying that a number of Republican members of Congress have told him they are tired of climate change denial by members of their own party.  The reason for their change in attitude, he believes, is the extreme weather events being reported on a daily basis in the nightly news.  Gore also alludes to the addition of another number to the hurricane classification scale, something of which I was unaware.  There is now a category 6, something which would give any thinking person reason to reconsider.

What the September hearings will accomplish remains to be seen.  A restive populace, as evidenced by growing numbers of protests from one coast to the other, accompanied by aggressive climate change campaigning on the part of Congressional Democrats, seems to be moving Republicans off of square one.  Whether or not square two can be even vaguely perceived from where legislators stand today may be much clearer, especially to Republicans, by the middle of next month.


With thanks to nationaljournal.com and thehill.com.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...