Skip to main content

Agreeing to Disagree


June 27, 2013 – First of all, let me apologize for my erratic posting schedule.  The good news is I was able to enjoy two brief vacations in June.  The further good news is that there are no more trips in the pipeline, so I’m back at it.  Since my posting schedule isn’t the only thing that’s been erratic lately, let’s talk about the weather.

Last Saturday, my husband, a friend, and I were heading back to Loveland from Indianapolis.  Traffic had been slow-moving on the way there, so we decided to take the long way home, thinking we’d be able to bypass the road construction.  Little did we know what lay ahead: strong winds, small hail, torrential rain that caused visibility to decline to zero at times, and electrical activity so intense that at one point we saw four cloud-to-ground lightning bolts strike at the same moment.  My husband prides himself on allowing nothing to keep him off the road; however, this time he bowed to a storm more fearsome than any the three of us had ever driven through before.

Our friend was visiting from Scottsdale, AZ.  She was raised there, moved away for a significant period of time, but returned for an active, early retirement.  Her fond memories of 105 degree temperatures have always raised my eyebrows, but she knew what to expect.  At times, 105 is still the forecast daytime high temperature for Scottsdale.  At other times – like the coming weekend – the forecast high is 117.  Honestly, can anything be done outside when the temperature is that high?  Even the lows are predicted to remain at or above 90.

Then there’s Texas and its neighboring state, Oklahoma.  Presumable everybody knows that Texas has been hit hard by an ongoing drought.  What I didn’t know was that, for the last three years, Texas and Oklahoma have been wrangling over the “excess water” held by the Red River.  The Red River constitutes a portion of their border, and the Red River Compact stipulates that each of them, along with Arkansas and Louisiana, is entitled to 25 percent of the excess in a particular sub-basin of the Red River.  That part’s not in dispute.  Texas insists, however, that its 25 percent includes water underlying Oklahoma.  Oklahoma disagrees, and the resulting court case went all the way to the Supreme Court.  The Supreme’s sided with Oklahoma.

There can be no doubt – Texas desperately needs water.  The ongoing drought has 95.2 percent of the state assessed anywhere from “abnormally dry” to “exceptional drought.”  Farming and ranching have both suffered because of the extraordinary dryness.  The state has lost 115,000 jobs and $11.9 billion during every year of the drought (three, so far).  As if that weren’t enough, Texas used more fresh water for power generation during 2011 than almost any other state.  The situation is becoming increasingly dire.

Twenty-three interstate water compacts closely resemble the Red River agreement.  Most of them involve western states, many of which have been impacted by the historic drought that is still in effect.  A number of the compacts contain ambiguous language, subject to interpretation.  It may be only a matter of time before other disagreements arise.  As for Texas, it has just allocated $5 million for another court battle over water, this time with New Mexico.

Because as we all know, you can’t use what you haven’t got.

 
With thanks to climateprogress.org.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We Are Still In

June 13, 2017 - Trump's announcement that the United States would withdraw from the Paris Accord on Climate Change has produced a remarkable backlash: hundreds of cities, states, universities and colleges, and businesses in the United States have declared their collective intention to reach the country's 2025 emissions goals, with or without federal leadership. America stepped up to the plate when Trump stated that he was "elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris," to which Pittsburgh's mayor responded "we [Pittsburgh] will follow the guidelines of the Paris Agreement for our people, our economy and future."

Bill Peduto, mayor of Pittsburgh, is a member of Mayors for 100% Clean Energy, the creation of Sierra Club, to which Michael Bloomberg is a major contributor. Bloomberg, former mayor of New York City and a billionaire philanthropist, is also the United Nations Envoy for Cities and Climate Change.
In a letter written by Bloomberg to…

The SunShot Initiative

In 2007, the amount of solar power installed in the U.S. was 1.1 gigawatts (GW). As of 2017, that amount has increased to 47.1 GW. Enough to power 9.1 million average American homes. If you're thinking "we've still got a long way to go," you'd be right. On the other hand, increasing installed power by 4300% deserves some attention.  How'd we do it?

The Department of Energy played an important role. In 2011, they initiated a program called The SunShot Initiative. They set targets for the years 2020 and 2030, by which times generating solar power would have become more affordable. More affordable on a utility scale, more affordable on a commercial scale, and more affordable on a residential scale. Thus far, they've succeeded in hitting the 2020 goal for utility-scale generation. Needless to mention, they reached that goal three years early. The goals, it should be mentioned, don't take subsidies into account. It's the technology, in the case of util…