Skip to main content

The Politics of Climate Change

June 15, 2013 – The political fallout resulting from global warming is ever more in evidence. Countries as diverse as Syria and China are both dealing with a dissatisfied populace that has taken matters into its own hands. Loss of faith in the government’s willingness to deal with environmental havoc resulted in 50,000 protests last year in China. I wrote recently of the climatic-political origins of the war in Syria. Where else might the climate change tinderbox ignite?


The Inter Press Service News Agency recently wrote that flooding has come to stay in Europe. Central and Eastern Europe, after an extremely long winter that was followed by weeks of strong storms (sound familiar?), has seen the Danube and Elbe Rivers rise to record levels. Twenty-one people died as a result, and thousands were evacuated. Mudslides closed down roads and train lines in Austria, and in the Czech Republic, 20,000 people were evacuated from 700 different locations. Damage in the CR is thus far estimated at 800 million euros.

In Budapest, Hungary, the Danube rose to the highest level ever recorded. Hungary’s controversial prime minister, Viktor Orban, has claimed credit for the smooth handling of rising waters in that country. Orban’s authoritarian methods garnered disapproval throughout Europe prior to the flooding, and there are many who are fearful of his growing influence. The dictatorship they dread may not amount to so very much: in my opinion, anyone who believes he can conquer the weather has a great deal to learn, and not much time to learn it. Indeed, at the Centre for Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Policy in Budapest, climate researcher Sergio Tirado was quoted as saying that extreme weather events will increase in frequency.

Pakistan continues to endure the unendurable. Temperatures as high as 124 degrees Fahrenheit were recorded during the last half of May through June 10. This is the besieged country’s third heatwave in four years. Hundreds have died, disease is still rampant, and agriculture – due to the lack of irrigation – has fared badly. Again, climatologists warn that longer, more intense and more frequent such episodes will occur in the future. While the recent heatwave has broken, the expected monsoon rains are often accompanied by an outbreak of diarrhea, because of contaminated drinking water. Heat stroke and dehydration could well become common. An increase in cholera, gastroenteritis, typhoid and hepatitis have all been observed, and are believed to be an effect of climate change. Is it possible that the one thing that keeps a political uprising from taking shape the people’s poor health?

Here in the United States, Colorado is on fire and California is as dry as a stick. I’ll write more about the increasing numbers of wildfires in this country on Monday. More and more climate activists – Bill McKibben, James Hansen, and Tim DeChristopher - are succeeding in politicizing what is very obviously a needlessly divisive issue. In a country where access to information is assured – and yes, quality information can be found by the determined researcher – there is no reason for the continued dominance in this area by one third of the population. There needs to be a whole lot of fact-driven campaigning that precedes the 2014 elections, at which time a whole lot of dumb butts need to be voted out of office.

Those would be Republican dumb butts, in case you were wondering.



With thanks to the IPS News Agency and the Guardian (UK).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Time to be Scared

November 26, 2018 You've heard by now that the US Global Change Research Program released its Fourth National Climate Assessment last Friday. Scientists are, at last, confident enough to say that climate change is the new reality. How very much I wish they had published this bold assertion many years ago, rather than always being hesitant (" . . . we're 73% sure this could happen . . ."). While I know the politics involved cannot be allowed to sway them, and that scientists are unaccustomed to speaking for the masses, their inability to convince the scientifically uneducated of the value in climate change hypotheses has hurt us all. In any event, they have now spoken up loudly and clearly. According to NOAA, one of the 13 government agencies responsible for the Assessment, we can expect the following, should mitigating actions not be taken immediately: - Human health and safety, quality of life, and economic growth will all suffer.        The 2014 Assessment c...

A Rock and a Hard Place

October 8, 2012 - Such a pickle: we have the coal, but no longer want to burn it.  China wants the coal, but shouldn't burn it because of the resulting air pollution.  Coal mining companies in the U.S. are ready and waiting to ship their coal to China.  Citizens of the U.S. living on its west coast are adamant they want nothing to do with exporting coal.  That includes Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber.  Kitzhaber's April 25 letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar expresses his profound skepticism about shipping coal by way of Oregon's ports.  He has requested that a programatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) first be conducted for all five of the export projects currently being considered, as well as a comprehensive policy review.  Here is part of a press release announcing his letter: "I have concerns about proceeding in this direction [exporting coal to China via Oregon ports] in the absence of a full national discussion about the ramif...