Skip to main content

But Is It Cheap?

June 3, 2013 – It’s interesting, on a number of levels, that leaders of the Atlanta Tea Party (ATP) are challenging utility company Georgia Power over its reluctance to increase use of solar power.  That, and the escalating costs of construction of a new nuclear power plant.  First and foremost, I’m perplexed that ATP co-founder Julianne Thompson found it necessary to assert that the organization’s position “certainly isn’t anything personal.”  Why is she denying what no one thinks is true to begin with?  Does she believe she is pre-empting other questions as well, by making a rhetorical statement?  She goes on to say that ”one of our core values is promoting the free-market system.”
The San Francisco Chronicle expands on this remark by pointing out that the electricity market in Georgia is not free.  Electric utilities have exclusive rights to serve customers in designated areas of the state; the majority of customers cannot choose their provider.  While this type of monopoly works well insofar as eliminating duplication of effort (the state does not need more than one system of wiring and pipes to deliver electricity and gas), the state must also be careful to regulate price when competition isn’t present.

A number of states, including Texas and most of the Northeast, regulate power delivery, but customers can select their provider.  Customers can select companies that provide options like renewable power or a slate of pricing categories (the state in which I live, Ohio, offers these options).  Not only do ATP members relish this opportunity, but polls reveal that Tea Party members distrust centralized authority, believing it to be an inevitable invitation to price increases.  Tea Party members also do not like prices to go up even when there is a commensurate benefit.
In May, another ATP co-founder, Debbie Dooley, lobbied Republican utility regulators to mandate that Georgia Power use more solar energy.  ( Solar energy’s connection to free markets and  competitive pricing remains very unclear to me. )  The state’s Public Service Commission, of which regulators are a part, is currently deciding if Georgia Power’s long-term plans to meet state energy needs is viable.  ATP members would actually like to see Georgia Power’s monopoly revoked, something which at this point is considered unlikely.

Commissioner Stan Wise (R) is doubtless typical in his reaction to ATP’s demands.  Like so many in his party, he believes the choice between conventional energy sources and solar energy should be based solely on economics .  The fact is, neither he nor ATP members take into consideration the environmental benefits of solar power.  Commissioner Wise goes so far as to accuse unnamed others as displaying a “kneejerk reaction that says if it’s solar, it has to be good.”  While I applaud ATP members’ insistence that nonconventional sources of energy be included in Georgia Power’s mix of generating possibilities, the collective ignorance of all parties concerned with regard to solar power’s most beneficial aspect cannot bode well. 
To my way of thinking, ignorance is a vacuum that ought to be filled with information.  As you and I both know, nature abhors a vacuum.

With thanks to the San Francisco Chronicle.


Popular posts from this blog

We Are Still In

June 13, 2017 - Trump's announcement that the United States would withdraw from the Paris Accord on Climate Change has produced a remarkable backlash: hundreds of cities, states, universities and colleges, and businesses in the United States have declared their collective intention to reach the country's 2025 emissions goals, with or without federal leadership. America stepped up to the plate when Trump stated that he was "elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris," to which Pittsburgh's mayor responded "we [Pittsburgh] will follow the guidelines of the Paris Agreement for our people, our economy and future."

Bill Peduto, mayor of Pittsburgh, is a member of Mayors for 100% Clean Energy, the creation of Sierra Club, to which Michael Bloomberg is a major contributor. Bloomberg, former mayor of New York City and a billionaire philanthropist, is also the United Nations Envoy for Cities and Climate Change.
In a letter written by Bloomberg to…

The SunShot Initiative

In 2007, the amount of solar power installed in the U.S. was 1.1 gigawatts (GW). As of 2017, that amount has increased to 47.1 GW. Enough to power 9.1 million average American homes. If you're thinking "we've still got a long way to go," you'd be right. On the other hand, increasing installed power by 4300% deserves some attention.  How'd we do it?

The Department of Energy played an important role. In 2011, they initiated a program called The SunShot Initiative. They set targets for the years 2020 and 2030, by which times generating solar power would have become more affordable. More affordable on a utility scale, more affordable on a commercial scale, and more affordable on a residential scale. Thus far, they've succeeded in hitting the 2020 goal for utility-scale generation. Needless to mention, they reached that goal three years early. The goals, it should be mentioned, don't take subsidies into account. It's the technology, in the case of util…