Skip to main content

Drought and heatwaves and fires - oh my!

June 17, 2013 - Perhaps no one word describes climate change better than volatile.  There are a number of words like volatile that can help clarify what is meant by climate change: mercurial, fluctuating, and transient all can be applied - at times - to this emerging phenomenon.  As it emerges, it will grow in geographical impact, grow in severity of effects, grow in variety of effects, and grow exponentially as a result of positive feedback.  Last year will always be better than this year.  It will outpace us - our inability to act collectively will result in millions of individual actions.  Most of them will have been poorly thought out.

For now, we must learn to accept that many of our poorly-informed collective actions only serve to compound errors.  Sequestration - a puzzling action at best - has stripped $50 million from the Forest Service's budget, eliminating the jobs of 500 firefighters.  Those still employed will have to make do with 50 fewer fire trucks than originally planned for purchase.  This, at a time when fire season lasts two months longer and destroys twice as much land as it did four decades ago, according to Thomas Tidwell, head of the U.S. Forest Service.  This, at a time when large forest fires occur more often than ever before in the western United States, due to an increase in springtime temperatures, early snow-melt, and hotter, drier summers.  Why are we spending less, when we need to spend far more? 

There is no end in sight.  A 2012 study in Ecosphere, the peer-reviewed journal of the Ecological Society of America, reveals that climate change will alter fire patterns across the globe by the year 2100.  A draft National Climate Assessment report, prepared by over 240 authors, contends "that human influence on the climate has already roughly doubled the probability of extreme heat events like the record-breaking summer of 2011 in Texas and Oklahoma."  Half of the western United States is experiencing the worst drought in 60 years.  Inadequate snow-melt and spring rains this year promise more of the same.  Yet another study links the warming Arctic to drought and heat waves in the U.S.

Some things require little explanation.  Drought accompanied by high temperatures makes trees drier.  Stronger winds and bigger storms create more fallen branches, called slash fuel.  Yes - fallen branches fuel wildfires.  When understory plants create "ladders" up into the forest canopy, fire follows these ladders.  Higher winds occupy the canopy, so fires gain momentum.  A little less obvious is the fact that the wetter weather that warmer, moister air causes leads to rapid tree growth.  When these trees dry out during the next drought, more fuel exists with which to feed fires.  The simultaneous higher temperatures cause fires to burn more fiercely.

If you're thinking about moving west, don't.  The environment has been pushed beyond its fragile limits.



With thanks to Mother Jones and the Guardian (UK).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The SunShot Initiative

In 2007, the amount of solar power installed in the U.S. was 1.1 gigawatts (GW). As of 2017, that amount has increased to 47.1 GW. Enough to power 9.1 million average American homes. If you're thinking "we've still got a long way to go," you'd be right. On the other hand, increasing installed power by 4300% deserves some attention.  How'd we do it?

The Department of Energy played an important role. In 2011, they initiated a program called The SunShot Initiative. They set targets for the years 2020 and 2030, by which times generating solar power would have become more affordable. More affordable on a utility scale, more affordable on a commercial scale, and more affordable on a residential scale. Thus far, they've succeeded in hitting the 2020 goal for utility-scale generation. Needless to mention, they reached that goal three years early. The goals, it should be mentioned, don't take subsidies into account. It's the technology, in the case of util…

Book Review: Irrevocable Acts

July 30, 2017 - Before I begin, let me mention that Jonnie Hyde is a member of the writing group I belong to, here in Vancouver, Wa. I took a stab at writing a novel about climate change awhile back; it wasn't very good, and subsequently went nowhere. Irrevocable Acts, on the other hand, is deserving of attention.

The beginning of Hyde's book is, perhaps, its only weak point: it's a bit confusing. All becomes clear as the book unfolds, and the characters are interesting, so there's no question of remaining involved. The characters hold your focus because they live their lives differently from most, yet the Sanders are a family, with three generations living under one roof: Anna, Kate, and Gracie. That family begins to unravel when the matriarch, Anna, decides she must embark, finally, on the life she was meant to live.

Anna, Danny Shepard, and Mac Caffrey have been friends most of their lives. Products of Berkeley at a time when the name Berkeley was believed to mean o…